--- On Sun, 11/10/09, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: DIS: Proto: Deal refactor (notes at bottom)
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Date: Sunday, 11 October, 2009, 12:19 AM
Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Dealing Refactor (AI=?, II=3)
I will
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Epsilon: (Voting limit: 1)
--
*allispaul
ais523
*c.
*coppro
CoE: I am both active and Savage.
-coppro
2009/10/11 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
I initiate a Motion To Effect, specifying the following Rate List:
Distrib-u-Matic: 55
The eligible voters for this Motion are the parties to this contract, the
voting period lasts for 72 hours, and the President is the Vote Collector.
The possible
2009/10/11 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:12, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
=== Grand Poobah's Caste report ===
(suggestions for witty report name wanted)
Date of this report: 11 Oct 2009
Date of last report: 30 Sep 2009
--- Caste of
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 17:25, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I initiate a Motion To Effect, specifying the following Rate List:
Distrib-u-Matic: 55
I vote AGAINST. I think this would stomp all
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Pavitra means that since this rate list includes only
Distrub-u-Matic and makes no reference to leaving other rates
unchanged it will NULL all other rates.
Oh. It won't do that per the IBA contract:
A Rate List is
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 15:25, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
After reading it again, I see how it could be interpreted differently
(and the way you suggest is probably the intent of the rule), however
when I
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhapsmy program can be easily changed, though this really has
nothing to do with automation, it has to do with how I (a human
person) interpreted the rule.
Suber's point was that the game judge should have the right
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Repeal R2217 (Periodic Elections)
[NOTE: Between the No Confidence card and the new assumption rule this
is really no longer necessary.]
You mean an Anarchist proposal actually has a chance of passing!?
--
-c.
9 matches
Mail list logo
