Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex wrote:
I repeat the following action 24 times:
- I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
due to CFJ 2674).
As allowed by R1504 I destroy the above 24 rests. Then I destroy 2
more rests in my possession.
This
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex wrote:
> I repeat the following action 24 times:
> - I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
> due to CFJ 2674).
>
Well, that was fun.
BobTHJ
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:50, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> Add a new card to the deck of change:
>>>
>>> Free Parking - Specify up to three assets owned by the L&FD. Those
>>> assets are
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:50, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Add a new card to the deck of change:
>>
>> Free Parking - Specify up to three assets owned by the L&FD. Those
>> assets are transferred to you.
>
> I could get ribbons and all sorts with
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I think they remained Democratic. My script mis-identified them as
> Ordinary (I changed it to match 6518 before entering 6522-31), they're
> fixed now and your votes are recorded.
Incidentally, shouldn't you resolve those?
-coppro
BobTHJ wrote:
> Nevermind, I only had 3 rests as of the time of this distrbution. For
And this is why copy+paste is dangerous, and also why voting results
self-ratifying is a Good Idea:
$q = // long but valid SQL
$q = query($q);
$ct = pg_fetch_object($q, 0);
$caste_then = $ct->caste_then;
if (!i
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:24 AM, comex wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I think it's pretty clear that CFJ 2720 has found an instance of
>> Admiral of the Navy to not exist. Therefore I create an Admiral of the
>> Navy card in the possession of Murphy (selected at
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I believe at the time of this distribution my voting limit was 1 (2 by
> caste, but I had 4 rests)
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 20:13, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> NUM II AI SUBMITTER TITLE
>> 6533 0 1.0 BobTHJ Periodic E
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Add a new card to the deck of change:
>
> Free Parking - Specify up to three assets owned by the L&FD. Those
> assets are transferred to you.
I could get ribbons and all sorts with that. I'd restrict it to cards.
--
Charles Walker
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 19:32, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> If I have at least as many Distrib-u-Matics as undistributable proposals
>>> in the pool, then for each such proposal, I play Distrib-u-Matic to make
>>> it distributable.
>>
>> Having worked things b
Add a new card to the deck of change:
Free Parking - Specify up to three assets owned by the L&FD. Those
assets are transferred to you.
BobTHJ
Charles Walker wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{
>
> More Separation of Powers (AI = 2, II = 1)
>
> Append the following to Rule 1450 (Separation of Powers):
>
> Lest the entire economy fall under the control of a single
> entity, any change that would result in the h
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:36 PM, comex wrote:
> LATIN SMALL LETTER SCHWA
>
> + Parties
> * Warrigal
> * coppro
> * teucer
> * allispaul
> * comex
> * Wooble
I left schwa.
> The Agoran Agricultural Association
>
> + Parties
>
> * Bayes
> * Murphy
> * Wooble (contestmaster)
BobTHJ is the contest
We don't because the Speaker could deposit eir major arcana then form
a government to get them back and stuff like that.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:45 AM, Charles Walker > wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:37 AM, comex wrote:
BUY [you pay zm]
Offerer Cost Selling
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:37 AM, comex wrote:
> BUY [you pay zm]
> Offerer Cost Selling
> Pavitra 500zm Minister without Portfolio
Don't we have rates for the Major Arcana? If not, I guess we should make some.
--
Charles Walker
15 matches
Mail list logo
