Sgeo wrote:
---
ID: 6545
Title: Because E's Worth It
Author: coppro
AI: 3.0
II: 1
Chamber: Red
Bestow unto Murphy the title of Hero of Agora Nomic.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
6569 1 1.0 coppro Green Quorum Busted
6560 1 1.0 coppro Green Anjusty
6561 1 1.0 coppro Green Contests Should Reward Themselves
6562 1 1.0 coppro Green
Wooble wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
6569 1 1.0 coppro GreenQuorum Busted
6560 1 1.0 coppro GreenAnjusty
6561 1 1.0 coppro GreenContests Should Reward Themselves
6562 1 1.0 coppro
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
(If this
happened a lot, then things would eventually tilt toward by now you
should be automating or paying more attention.)
Considering how often it happened the last time we had a non-automated
promotor, I'd expect
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
I'm
also worried that the whole concept of qualified notice is a massive can
of worms; it would seem to allow contract changes to /platonically/
depend on ambiguity, which allows typical Gnarly Contract scams, as well
as muddling the waters in general.
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 09:00 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
I'm
also worried that the whole concept of qualified notice is a massive can
of worms; it would seem to allow contract changes to /platonically/
depend on ambiguity, which allows typical Gnarly
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 09:00 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
I'm
also worried that the whole concept of qualified notice is a massive can
of worms; it would seem to allow contract changes to /platonically/
depend on ambiguity,
[Since it's the popular will to devalue distributability, why should I
suffer from conscience?]
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following proposal Herald tracks dishonor, AI=2 please:
I withdraw the above proposal.
I submit the following proposal Herald tracks dishonor,
Hey c.,
If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it... let's
get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)!
-G.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it... let's
get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)!
proto: adopt B's ruleset, then re-agorify it.
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it...
let's
get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)!
proto: adopt B's ruleset, then re-agorify
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it...
let's
get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)!
proto: adopt
Tiger wrote:
I vote as follows, casting each vote 5 times if it's a Green decision
and 3 times if it's a Red one:
FYI your VLOP is 5 for Green, 1 for Red, 2 for Purple.
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, comex wrote:
Proposal: Citrine Card Repeal (AI=2)
Hey hey hey, the previous citrine repeals were more than just cards!
Not gonna get my vote on some without the whole...
Also, just a reflection. When we wrote the great repeals, we wrote it
because the gameplay is slowing.
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 09:30 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 09:00 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
I'm
also worried that the whole concept of qualified notice is a massive can
of worms; it would seem to allow
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
I mean the first; and without 3 objections was one of the options I
gave, so you need to show that there were three objections (in the
contract's warped sense of objection), not just one. Just one of those
loose ends that needs tidying up before we can
Wooble wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it...
let's
get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)!
proto: adopt B's ruleset, then re-agorify it.
DO NOT WANT
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
I mean the first; and without 3 objections was one of the options I
gave, so you need to show that there were three objections (in the
contract's warped sense of objection), not just one. Just one of those
loose ends
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, comex wrote:
Proposal: Citrine Card Repeal (AI=2)
Hey hey hey, the previous citrine repeals were more than just cards!
Not gonna get my vote on some without the whole...
I was
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, comex wrote:
On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, comex wrote:
Proposal: Citrine Card Repeal (AI=2)
Hey hey hey, the previous citrine repeals were more than just cards!
Not gonna get my vote on some without the
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
---
ID: 6545
Title: Because E's Worth It
Author: coppro
AI: 3.0
II: 1
Chamber: Red
Bestow unto Murphy the title of Hero of Agora
ais523 wrote:
I mean the first; and without 3 objections was one of the options I
gave, so you need to show that there were three objections (in the
contract's warped sense of objection), not just one. Just one of those
loose ends that needs tidying up before we can finally put this case to
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
I mean the first; and without 3 objections was one of the options I
gave, so you need to show that there were three objections (in the
contract's warped sense of objection), not just one. Just one of those
loose ends that needs tidying up
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 12:05 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
I mean the first; and without 3 objections was one of the options I
gave, so you need to show that there were three objections (in the
contract's warped sense of objection), not just one. Just one of those
loose ends that
2009/11/9 comex com...@gmail.com:
Anyone up for mafia? to avoid a repeat of Werewolves, we can increase the
pace. One day per real-life day would be fun.
I'm in, but not right now. However, when NaNoWriMo ends I'll start
looking over my fluxx contest again, and I'd be happy to join other
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I have decided to cease maintaining nomic.bob-space.com and step back
from Agora for a bit. I will attempt to do so without leaving things
in a state of dissarray. My site is updated through Tue, Nov 3 23:34,
just prior to
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
And to the PF even:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following proposal Herald tracks dishonor, AI=2 please:
I withdraw the above proposal.
I submit the following proposal Herald tracks dishonor,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
(also, now that I look, I believe the list of parties to be
inaccurate. If this is fatal to the intiation of the case, I request
that H. Notary c. issue an amended version of eir report, from which I
got this list. It is eir
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Let's just get rid of NoVs altogether and initiate criminal cases
directly from offenses, and giving the accused the additional option
of judging their own case GUILTY/SILENCE with at least as many Rests
as the power of the rule or GUILTY/TIME OUT.
Sure,
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Let's just get rid of NoVs altogether and initiate criminal cases
directly from offenses, and giving the accused the additional option
of judging their own case GUILTY/SILENCE with at least as many Rests
as the power of the rule or GUILTY/TIME OUT.
ps.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Let's just get rid of NoVs altogether and initiate criminal cases
directly from offenses, and giving the accused the additional option
of judging their own case GUILTY/SILENCE with
2009/11/9 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
Hey c.,
If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it... let's
get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)!
-G.
i guess nobody is in a hurry to distribute *my* mass-repeal proposal huh :D
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
ps. the system is not just to give the defendant the time to declare
emself guilty; it's so e gets the time to consider and post eir defense
of innocence (with some officer help, it's possible for the case to go
from
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
ps. the system is not just to give the defendant the time to declare
emself guilty; it's so e gets the time to consider and post eir defense
of innocence
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2730
== Criminal Case 2730 (Interest Index = 0) ===
c. violated Rule 2253 (Power-2) by creating the card Presto! in
eir
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, as arguments for this case I'd like to point out that I did
coppro a favor by not awarding eir points before, since (unless a
skunk is declared, which I OBJECT to coppro's attempt to do, this
wasn't a scammed win by
coppro wrote:
Proposal: alt.office.accountor.die.die.die (AI=1, II=0)
{{{
Repeal Rule 2181 (The Accountor).
}}}
IMO we have this guy because the report defined by that rule is a
useful list of all the bits of the economy that a player might be
interested in.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I submit the following proposal, Herald Decorations, AI-1 and
disinterested. I make it distributable.
---
Amend Rule 2199 (Ribbons) by
Proto (coppro coauthor). Taking the simple approach of condensing NoV
process. Doesn't mess with criminal cases after that (appeals etc.).
--
Repeal Rule 2230 (Notices of Violation).
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I'd don't see the issue with having many low-burden offices rather
than fewer higher burden ones.
Uh, election overhead, vacant offices, lots of disparate records in
places... but it's really a matter of adjusting the responsibilities
to the current
2009/11/9 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
If I have any, I spend a Distrib-u-matic to make Stoma Moats of Atoms
distributable.
Didn't I do that? Hmm.
2009/11/9 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
I have decided to cease maintaining nomic.bob-space.com and step back
from Agora for a bit.
I have a strange feeling of déjà vu...
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
---
ID: 6545
Title: Because E's Worth It
Author: coppro
AI: 3.0
II: 1
Chamber: Red
Bestow unto Murphy the title of Hero of
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Proto (coppro coauthor). Taking the simple approach of condensing NoV
process. Doesn't mess with criminal cases after that (appeals etc.).
I'll take a look at this when I get home.
Also, c. and G., what say you to,
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Proposal: alt.office.accountor.die.die.die (AI=1, II=0)
{{{
Repeal Rule 2181 (The Accountor).
}}}
IMO we have this guy because the report defined by that rule is a
useful list of all the bits of the economy that a player might be
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 15:09, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/11/9 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
I have decided to cease maintaining nomic.bob-space.com and step back
from Agora for a bit.
I have a strange feeling of déjà vu...
Ahh, ehirdI knew you wouldn't let
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Proto (coppro coauthor). Taking the simple approach of condensing NoV
process. Doesn't mess with criminal cases after that (appeals etc.).
I'll take a look at this when I get
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
ps. no one mentioned it, so does anyone but me happen to know the
source for admiral of the navy joke (it's reasonably obscure).
Nope, but I was planning to have fun with the shelling if only I could
get the card...
--
It's less than one week of backlog, FYI.
BobTHJ
Two. Your last reports were on October 26, except for your posting of
what cards people were owed (a reminder to recordkeepors, including
myself, that draws earned need to be posted).
-coppro
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Registrar's Census
This report now includes player Salary.
-coppro
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 16:11, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
It's less than one week of backlog, FYI.
BobTHJ
Two. Your last reports were on October 26, except for your posting of
what cards people were owed (a reminder to recordkeepors, including
myself, that draws earned need to be
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
My site contains accurate reports and data up to the recent assessor
report that resolved your dealing refactor proposal (Nov 3). If you'd
like I'll send unofficial copies of those reports to the list.
As new herald and insulator I would appreciate a
2009/11/9 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
Ahh, ehirdI knew you wouldn't let me down.
I'm here all week!
G. wrote:
The Clerk of the Courts SHALL NOT assign a judge to a criminal
case until 4 days have passed from its initiation, to give
This only gives the CotC a 3-day window to assign a judge. How about:
The initiation of a criminal case begins its pre-trial phase,
Yally wrote:
I always figured you would become a Grand Hero after you died.
Yes, well, hopefully that's at least a few decades off.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have not yet voted in the Anarchist Election, you are hereby
HUMILIATED and expected to cast a vote.
-coppro
Who are the candidates?
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have not yet voted in the Anarchist Election, you are hereby
HUMILIATED and expected to cast a vote.
-coppro
Who are the candidates?
Myself and BobTHJ.
-coppro
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
This message serves to resolve the election for the holder of the
office of Ambassador. There are no eligible candidates; it remains empty.
-coppro
You mean Grand Poobah.
2009/11/9 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
I intend, without objection, to deregister People's Bank of Agora.
Alas
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have not yet voted in the Anarchist Election, you are hereby
HUMILIATED and expected to cast a vote.
-coppro
Who are
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote coppro (if I re-joined before the election started). -G.
Eligibility to vote in an election is not fixed at the start of the
voting period. Does that count as an annotation or a conditional vote?
-coppro
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to deregister Taral.
please to not deregister the distributor, lest the mailing list
unexpectedly go poof.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to deregister Teucer.
Wait, I'm registered right now?
Huh.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote coppro (if I re-joined before the election started). -G.
Eligibility to vote in an election is not fixed at the start of the voting
period. Does that count as an annotation or a conditional vote?
It is fairly
64 matches
Mail list logo
