DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Make My Job a Little Easier

2009-12-05 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Proposal: Make My Job a Little Easier (AI = 2, II = 1) { > > Amend the sentence in Rule 2177 (The Senate) reading: > > A Senator is any first-class player whose most recent > registration was at least sixty days ago. > > to read: > > A Sen

DIS: Re: BUS: Written defense

2009-12-05 Thread Sean Hunt
Kerim Aydin wrote: Note: R1367 may be broken with respect to voting limits associated with colors. As Herald (vote collector), I initiate an Agoran Decision initiate to award coppro a degree for eir thesis "The Propositional Nomic" (http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-offi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Make My Job a Little Easier

2009-12-05 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> Proposal: Make My Job a Little Easier (AI = 2, II = 1) { >> >> Amend the sentence in Rule 2177 (The Senate) reading: >> >>      A Senator is any first-class player whose most recent >>      registra

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Make My Job a Little Easier

2009-12-05 Thread Sean Hunt
Aaron Goldfein wrote: Proposal: Make My Job a Little Easier (AI = 2, II = 1) { Amend the sentence in Rule 2177 (The Senate) reading: A Senator is any first-class player whose most recent registration was at least sixty days ago. to read: A Senator is any first-class player w

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Written defense

2009-12-05 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: > I have good news! I've worked out the maximum voting limits for each player: > > 1 > > see Rule . Hey, nicely done! It's a good thing the previous thesis self-ratified. -G.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Make My Job a Little Easier

2009-12-05 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Rule 2130 does say that " A player who has been continuously Inactive > for at least three months CAN be deregistered by any other player > without objection." I don't see how this is any different.