On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 17:16 -0500, comex wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:13 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 23:13 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
I vote and take other actions as follows:
6615 1 2.0
2010/1/19 ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk:
6608 3 1.0 c.GreenA Terrible Proposals
FOR, but I suspect this is not a proposal; IIRC, I'm the author of this
one (unless c. submitted a copy of my proposal and I didn't notice).
The typo aside (should be singular
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
I'm not sure this works, but will vote against it regardless.
That's fine politically, but are you willing to provide any specifics
on your not sure? Purely out of academic interest of course. -G.
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
(rendering the
rulechange effectively meaningless, at least if e plans on keeping
doing that...).
It still works fine for orphaned proposals that no-one's too bothered
about; I'm guessing scam-reasons for keeping proposals in-system will
be pretty
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 09:09 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
(rendering the
rulechange effectively meaningless, at least if e plans on keeping
doing that...).
It still works fine for orphaned proposals that no-one's too bothered
about; I'm guessing
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
It still works fine for orphaned proposals that no-one's too bothered
about; I'm guessing scam-reasons for keeping proposals in-system will
be pretty rare. -G.
No, and that's the thing. c. resubmitted the proposals by
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2732
=== Equity Case 2732 (Interest Index = 0)
BobTHJ abused eir position as Secretary of Agriculture to award
emself points
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:20 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Question for anyone who knows: did BobTHJ violate any obligation while
doing this?
I believe (am not sure) that e did not directly violate any
requirements by it, but the expectation is that a contestmaster will
act fairly to all
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Question for anyone who knows: did BobTHJ violate any obligation while
doing this?
e was required to award points as soon as possible after the events
triggering the awards; whether e is relieved of this obligation by
leaving the
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:20 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Question for anyone who knows: did BobTHJ violate any obligation while
doing this?
I believe (am not sure) that e did not directly violate any
requirements by
10 matches
Mail list logo
