DIS: Re: BUS: Unfortunately

2010-02-06 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 6 February 2010 22:09, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I intend, without objection, to make ehird inactive. >> >> May you see better days. > > I go on hold. > You're already on hold.

DIS: Re: OFF: Promotor's Proposal Pool Report

2010-02-06 Thread Sean Hunt
On 02/06/2010 02:53 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: Title: Agree to Disagree Author: coppro AI: 3.0 II: 3 Chamber: Red Repeal every rule (in numerical order) that, in the most recent publication of the FLR prior to the publication of this proposal, was in the Contract Law category. Repeal Rule 2169

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6621-6634

2010-02-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Tiger wrote: > 6622 1 3.0 G.* GreenTake a third option > 6623 1 2.0 G.GreenHold still! > 6624 1 2.0 G.GreenFix hypothetical situations > 6625 1 3.0 G.GreenProposals must obey security > 6626 1 3.0 G.

DIS: Re: OFF: Promotor's Proposal Pool Report

2010-02-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Tiger wrote: > All proposals made distributable and then removed from the pool before > being distributed are also still distributable, but too many to list > here. Not since you fixed R1607 a few months ago.