On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
Gratuitous Arguments by comex:
Would win announcement: Proposal 6740 was adopted
suffice? If not (as I read it), awarding a win to one or more
persons is part of the format of the announcement, so whatever is
specified in place of 'one or more
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgment, as it implies that the
win
announcement is in fact the adoption of the proposal, but does not fully
address whether a posting the text of a proposal
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This clearly wins by Legislation if it's taken as deferring to (being
intercepted by?) the power-1 Rule 2188. But does it (power-3 instrument)
override the power-2 clause in R2186: The game CANNOT be won in any other
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, comex wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This clearly wins by Legislation if it's taken as deferring to (being
intercepted by?) the power-1 Rule 2188. But does it (power-3 instrument)
override the power-2 clause in
Hmm, I'm suddenly unconvinced that Win Announcements work at all for
most defined win conditions.
A win announcement must be factually correct in announcing that
someone wins the game (R2186).
But most win conditions are not triggered until a win announcement
is made (are triggered upon a win
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 13:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Hmm, I'm suddenly unconvinced that Win Announcements work at all for
most defined win conditions.
A win announcement must be factually correct in announcing that
someone wins the game (R2186).
A win announcment need not state that
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 13:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Hmm, I'm suddenly unconvinced that Win Announcements work at all for
most defined win conditions.
A win announcement must be factually correct in announcing that
someone wins the game
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The difficulty in ALL win conditions, that 2186 specifies one set
of conditions for calling something a win announcement, and that other
rules say that it has to be a winning announcement with different
(not additional)
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:03 -0400, comex wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The difficulty in ALL win conditions, that 2186 specifies one set
of conditions for calling something a win announcement, and that other
rules say that it has to be a
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 14:05 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 13:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Hmm, I'm suddenly unconvinced that Win Announcements work at all for
most defined win conditions.
A win announcement must be
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 14:05 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 13:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Hmm, I'm suddenly unconvinced that Win Announcements work at all for
most defined win
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, comex wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The difficulty in ALL win conditions, that 2186 specifies one set
of conditions for calling something a win announcement, and that other
rules say that it has to be a winning
G. wrote:
The problem now is (if we accept that it's circular to say that
one or more people won in order to cause those one or more people
to win) that:
Rule 2215 (Truthiness) suggests (albeit weakly) that such
bootstrapping is allowed.
On 07/29/2010 02:42 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Hmm, I'm suddenly unconvinced that Win Announcements work at all for
most defined win conditions.
A win announcement must be factually correct in announcing that
someone wins the game (R2186).
But most win conditions are not triggered until a win
Yally wrote:
I support and appeal this case.
I'm interpreting this intent/support/appeal as reasonable
shorthand for doing so for each of CFJs 2821 and 2822.
15 matches
Mail list logo
