On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this fails; you did not specify which Fragments you were using.
Submitting the proposal succeeded, but making it a D-Proposal failed.
—Lawyer Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Alex Smith
callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On an unrelated note, my primary computer's power supply shorted out and
caught fire a few days ago, meaning that I have only minimal use of it over
the next couple of weeks until a replacement can be shipped
On 21 August 2010 05:14, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
Or use GMail, which has a plain text mode.
E won't, because e trusts Google even less than Yahoo. :)
ais523, are you still planning on manually sending emails via telnet
to agoranomic.org?
If so, this is a non-issue (except if one would
-coppro
Keba wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
6805 G 1 1.0 KebaProps should be important!
This decision doesn't exist, but ENDORSE the Captain just in case
Why does this decision not exist? ais523 had payed a fee to make it
distributable?
IIRC, the initial distribution was ineffective
Sgeo wrote:
6806 P 1 3.1 coppro Ratification misstep
PRESENT [What's this for?]
IIRC, ratifying the ruleset is currently rendered ineffective by
Rule 105's Rule changes always occur sequentially.
On 08/21/2010 02:32 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
6808 P 1 1.0 coppro Super Robot Powers
AGAINST (I smell a scam consisting of an affordably short sub-message
within a 1000+ word container message)
I sure hope not; that's why I built the Robot rule and the recent
proposed amendment of
coppro wrote:
On 08/21/2010 02:32 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
6808 P 1 1.0 coppro Super Robot Powers
AGAINST (I smell a scam consisting of an affordably short sub-message
within a 1000+ word container message)
I sure hope not; that's why I built the Robot rule and the recent
8 matches
Mail list logo
