On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 12:07 AM, omd wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> > > The asset defined is not "white ribbon"; it is "ribbon". Every ribbon
> > > then has a color. A white ribbon is a ribbon whose color is white;
> > > even though th
On 09/08/2010 12:07 AM, omd wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Warrigal wrote:
The asset defined is not "white ribbon"; it is "ribbon". Every ribbon
then has a color. A white ribbon is a ribbon whose color is white;
even though the rules stop using the term "white ribbon", white does
not c
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> The asset defined is not "white ribbon"; it is "ribbon". Every ribbon
> then has a color. A white ribbon is a ribbon whose color is white;
> even though the rules stop using the term "white ribbon", white does
> not cease to be a color. (Likewise,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> While this does result in White Ribbons not being needed for a
>> Renaissance win (as White is no longer mentioned in the rule), it does
>> not result in White Ribbons ceasing to exist, as t
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> While this does result in White Ribbons not being needed for a
> Renaissance win (as White is no longer mentioned in the rule), it does
> not result in White Ribbons ceasing to exist, as they are never
> destroyed and are still implicitly defined.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> Proposal "White Renaissance" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2199 "Ribbons" by removing:
>
> (except for White Ribbons, which can be awarded at any time
> within a month after they are earned)
>
> [So, no one posses
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 17:06 -0400 schrieb omd:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> >> Why were White Ribbons removed in the first place?
> >
> > See CfJ 2836. White Ribbons only exist because of that phrase, if this
> > phrase is deleted, all white ribbons are deleted as well.
>
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 17:06 -0400 schrieb omd:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> >> Why were White Ribbons removed in the first place?
> >
> > See CfJ 2836. White Ribbons only exist because of that phrase, if this
> > phrase is deleted, all white ribbons are deleted as well.
>
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:06 -0400, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> >> Why were White Ribbons removed in the first place?
> >
> > See CfJ 2836. White Ribbons only exist because of that phrase, if this
> > phrase is deleted, all white ribbons are deleted as well.
>
> Yeah
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Keba wrote:
>> Why were White Ribbons removed in the first place?
>
> See CfJ 2836. White Ribbons only exist because of that phrase, if this
> phrase is deleted, all white ribbons are deleted as well.
Yeah, why did their regular definition get removed? I like them
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 16:20 -0400 schrieb omd:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Proposal "White Renaissance" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
> > {{{
> > Amend Rule 2199 "Ribbons" by removing:
> >
> >(except for White Ribbons, which can be awarded at any time
> >
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> Proposal "White Renaissance" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2199 "Ribbons" by removing:
>
> (except for White Ribbons, which can be awarded at any time
> within a month after they are earned)
>
> [So, no one posses
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
> Proposal: Capa (AI=2, Distributable via fee)
>
> In the first sentence of Rule 2289 (Capacitors), remove the word "fixed".
Get rid of yellow ribbons in the same proposal?
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 11:13 -0700, Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> > 6834 P 1 3.0 G. voter defaults
> > 6835 G 1 1.0 KebaProps should not lead to a win
> > 6836 P 1 3.0 G.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Keba wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I resign as Promotor.
>
> I transfer a prop from Wooble (because problems are not solved by
> resigning) to Andon (because e will not be listed in the ATC's report
> separately anymore then).
Fails; Andon is not a player.
Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Hm, I like the weekly destroying of ergs and capacitors, because I like
> > the way the current economy works, so I am against a manual destroying.
>
> Well, one of our stated purposes is to allow players to accumulate
> power. Ho
Keba wrote:
> > URGENT PROPOSAL
> > title: Demarcation
> > chamber: Purple
> > ai: 2.0
> > interest: 1
> > proposer: omd
> > submit_date: 2010-09-04
> > submit_mid:
> > distributability: undistributable
> > distributability flipped: 2010-09-04 00:00:00
> >
> > Make all players Unmarked.
>
> I in
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Keba wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 09:00 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Keba wrote:
>> > Keba wrote:
>> >> I intend without two objections, to flip the Distributability of my
>> >> proposal entitled "Perpetuum mobile" to di
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 09:00 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Keba wrote:
> >> I intend without two objections, to flip the Distributability of my
> >> proposal entitled "Perpetuum mobile" to distributable.
> >
> > Received no objections, I do s
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Keba wrote:
> Keba wrote:
>> I intend without two objections, to flip the Distributability of my
>> proposal entitled "Perpetuum mobile" to distributable.
>
> Received no objections, I do so.
>
> [Damn it, I should have done so yesterday...]
Fails; there is no prop
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 08:41 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Keba wrote:
> > Thu 02 Sep 19:56 G. DU In case of emergency
> > Sun 05 Sep 14:07 G. D Coup Bug Fix
> > Sun 05 Sep 14:11 G. D Reward Urgency
> >
> > where DU means distributing
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Keba wrote:
> Thu 02 Sep 19:56 G. DU In case of emergency
> Sun 05 Sep 14:07 G. D Coup Bug Fix
> Sun 05 Sep 14:11 G. D Reward Urgency
>
> where DU means distributing an Urgent Proposal.
At the time this purportedly-urgent proposal was submitt
22 matches
Mail list logo
