On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Warrigalihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
The asset defined is not white ribbon; it is ribbon. Every ribbon
then has a color. A white ribbon is a ribbon whose color is white;
even
On 8 September 2010 14:08, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 September 2010 04:05, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what shall we do first? I guess I can draft a proposal to create
an accumulable
Warrigal wrote:
I submit a proposal, titled Capacitative Accumulability, AI = 2, II
= 1, Tiger as coauthor:
{Amend Rule 2289 by appending to the first paragraph, Polarisation is
a capacitor switch with values Charging (default) and Discharging. Any
player CAN by announcement destroy a
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Warrigal wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Warrigalihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
The asset defined is not white ribbon; it is ribbon. Every ribbon
then has a color. A white ribbon is a
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 8, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No, the operative phrase in currency is class.
Ribbons are a class of fixed assets.
- Rule 2199
So a particular Ribbon is actually in two distinct classes of asset...
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 8, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No, the operative phrase in currency is class.
Ribbons are a class of fixed assets.
- Rule 2199
So a particular Ribbon is actually in two distinct
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
[Generally, this could be done by the CotC very well, but both the CotC
and the Herald got to do too many jobs, so we are ready for a new
office.]
I agree, but let me offer a puzzle. Refactor the following jobs into
three offices, balanced for both theme and
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
Keba wrote:
I Bestow Favors:
1. Tanner L. Swett
2. Tiger
3. ais523
4. Wooble
5. coppro
If this failed, I Bestow Favors:
1. Kitchen Staff Supervisor: Tanner L. Swett
2. Justiciar: ais523
3. Grand
Am Mittwoch, den 08.09.2010, 14:46 -0700 schrieb Kerim Aydin:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
Keba wrote:
I Bestow Favors:
1. Tanner L. Swett
2. Tiger
3. ais523
4. Wooble
5. coppro
If this failed, I Bestow Favors:
1. Kitchen Staff
Current Rebellion success odds are 8/14.
A few hours left, friendly non-aligned citizens!
We're not taking names, fellow citizens, but you are:
Tanner L. Swett
ais523
woggle
Murphy
Sgeo
Yally
-Comrade G.
Note that class isn't actually defined by the rules. It could just
as easily be type, or even set. If the rules state that something
is a class of asset, that doesn't really tell us anything we didn't
already know.
Now, here's what the key thing to realize is, as I see it. An asset
only exists if
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
My argument is that this is governed by R2140(c). A Proposal is an
instrument of power, and if it attempts to create a token, it is
modifying a substantive aspect of the rule defining the Tokens (my
argument implies
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that class isn't actually defined by the rules. It could just
as easily be type, or even set. If the rules state that something
is a class of asset, that doesn't really tell us anything we didn't
already know.
Here's a
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:44 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a question.
An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule or contest
(hereafter its backing document), and existing solely because
its backing document defines its existence.
If oblique references from
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, omd wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
I Bestow Favors:
1. Tanner L. Swett
2. Tiger
3. ais523
4. Wooble
5. coppro
I pay a fee (5 ergs) to move Tiger down to the fifth position on the
List of Succession.
I
Warrigal wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 September 2010 04:05, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what shall we do first? I guess I can draft a proposal to create
an accumulable currency that you can turn ergs into. What
Warrigal wrote:
(CotC Murphy, I'm curious what your reasoning is for assigning H.
ais523 to all of these cases.)
Aglets.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Does fungibility break this?
No, because capacitors are not a currency.
—Tanner L. Swett
Wooble wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, this is broken...
As required by Rule 107, since there is only 1 option, I end the
voting period for the Promotor election.
The option chosen would be FAILED QUORUM. The voting period is
Warrigal wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Does fungibility break this?
No, because capacitors are not a currency.
Huh, and neither are ergs and fans. Was that intentional? Unlike
cards, there's no obvious reason in the existing ruleset to
20 matches
Mail list logo
