omd wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> title: Erratification
>> ai: 1.0
>> interest: 1
>> proposer: omd
>> submit_date: 2010-09-19
>> submit_mid:
>> distributability: undistributable
>>
>> Ratify the following incorrect document: { 1 + 1 = 3 }
>
> I withdraw this
omd wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Alternatively, they could have been given chaotic numbers like 1401
>> through 1401, so that the orderly numbers would still roughly
>> reflect the number of distinct statements.
>
> That's roughly what you tried, isn't it
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Alternatively, they could have been given chaotic numbers like 1401
> through 1401, so that the orderly numbers would still roughly
> reflect the number of distinct statements.
That's roughly what you tried, isn't it? Zefram and you att
omd wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Actually, they all fail, by the precedent of CFJ 1774.
>>
>> Counterargument: Â the disparity of effort between Tanner announcing
>> "I perform $BIGNUM times" and the relevant
>> officer recording that e did so is much less than i
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Actually, they all fail, by the precedent of CFJ 1774.
>
> Counterargument: the disparity of effort between Tanner announcing
> "I perform $BIGNUM times" and the relevant
> officer recording that e did so is much less than in CFJ 1774, which
>
omd wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> I resign from all offices and become supine. I describe my becoming
>> supine just now as earning me 2*3^35,000 farads; for this action, I
>> award myself 3^35,000 ergs. I pay fees to destroy all my rests, then
>> pay fees to destroy
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> I resign from all offices and become supine. I describe my becoming
> supine just now as earning me 2*3^35,000 farads; for this action, I
> award myself 3^35,000 ergs. I pay fees to destroy all my rests, then
> pay fees to destroy ergs in my posses
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 21:18 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > the truth of the condition, the only conclusion is that it's undecidable
> > whether or not alise managed to become inactive; unlike, say,
> > registration where there's a requirement to be reasonably unambiguous,
>
> Who's
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Trivially true. You CAN register by publishing any message indicating
> that you intend to register; an explicit announcement that you do so
> is a published message that indicates just that.
I hereby register.*
I do not intend to registe
On 8 October 2010 05:18, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Who's alise?
My IRC nick, which originated as a joke, and then I was too lazy to change it.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:20 AM, John Smith wrote:
> With the desire to get this out of the way ahead of time, I initiate an
> inquiry CfJ on the following statement:
> "Bucky CAN register by announcement"
>
> Arguments:The rule regarding registration does not explicitly state that it
> can be pe
Thanks, Murphy! Without you, I'd have to read the rules, and then
where would we be? :)
On 8 October 2010 00:29, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 06:28 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>
>> Okay, sorry.
>>
>> The Shuttle's Position is 6, as it has moved 6 times since last report
>> (when it was 0).
>>
>
> Isn't the Shuttle destroyed?
>
> -coppro
>
Right, yes. I forgot we fixed that bug.
13 matches
Mail list logo
