On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> CFJ: MRW and Associates is a second-class person.
What rule with power of at least 2 defines MRW and Associates as a person?
If agreements-as-persons doesn't work, then R2205(3) should be removed
(and (4) renumbered). If it does, then we may want to revive some form
of the equity case; to prevent the delays that plagued the old version,
I suggest assigning them to a panel of all players who are active as of
the assignme
2 matches
Mail list logo
