On 18 October 2011 05:07, woggle wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
I suppose.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Arguments: It'll come in with "BUS:" prefixed to the subject line if
> approved; no mail client is going to merge two messages with different
> subjects without any kind of threading info.
iirc, not if it already has BUS:, so you can make you
On 17 October 2011 17:01, Sean Hunt wrote:
> What is this i don't even.
Hey, just because Arkady sent HTML mail doesn't mean you should too. :p
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:34, Arkady English wrote:
I decided to give it a title at the time of distribution. Seeing as I
> authored the proposal, I don't see the problem there. In any case, CFJ1546
> and CFJ1669 would indicate that this is legal, as the addition of the title
> does not affect t
On 17 October 2011 17:01, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:09, Arkady English <
> arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As UTC Midnight, this week, the proposal pool has the following:
>
>
> What is this i don't even.
>
>
>>
>> 7126: Cambridge Bye-Law
>> In order to demonstrate
On 07/30/2011 11:21 AM, Pavitra wrote:
> [Preamble: contracts used to be able to impose SHALL requirements. I
> believe the following will in effect enable the same for Promises,
> without most of the problems that the old system had.]
>
> I submit the following proposal, "SHALL Promises", AI=1:
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:09, Arkady English wrote:
> As UTC Midnight, this week, the proposal pool has the following:
What is this i don't even.
>
> 7126: Cambridge Bye-Law
> In order to demonstrate their committment to justice, all standing judges
> are
> required to wear a sword at all ti
On 17 October 2011 16:33, ais523 wrote:
> There is threading info, though, as the two messages have the same ID.
Will they? Even when the subject changes? I'd think mailman would
change that, but if not...
I was going to go through http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html to
figure out how the "ide
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:58 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 16 October 2011 23:29, ais523 wrote:
> > Arguments: Interestingly, a-b has decided not to forward the message
> > without a list moderator approving it, which makes the situation even
> > more interesting.
>
> Arguments: It'll come in wi
--90e6ba6e80dee8380004af7f271b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=
As UTC Midnight, this week, the proposal pool has the following:
On 16 October 2011 23:29, ais523 wrote:
> Arguments: Interestingly, a-b has decided not to forward the message
> without a list moderator approving it, which makes the situation even
> more interesting.
Arguments: It'll come in with "BUS:" prefixed to the subject line if
approved; no mail client
11 matches
Mail list logo
