On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Pavitra wrote:
> >
> > Given that the intent is so obvious, it's more reasonable to parse it
> > as "all first-class players [each individually] have at least 14".
>
> There's still legitimate ambiguity regarding awarding props
> simultaneously/serially: if the prop holdin
On 08/24/2012 03:31 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
>> On 08/24/2012 01:32 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
>>> {{{
>>> Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
>>> first-class players have at least 14 props.
>>> }}}
>>
>> I think that the intent is
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3258
>
> == CFJ 3258 ==
I CFJ on the following: The CotC is all caught up with eir duties for once.
:)
Pavitra wrote:
On 08/24/2012 01:32 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
{{{
Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
first-class players have at least 14 props.
}}}
I think that the intent is
{
For some constant K, award K props to each first class player; ch
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:32 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
> > {{{
> > Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
> > first-class players have at least 14 props.
> > }}}
>
> Do props actually exist? I can't find them
On 08/24/2012 01:32 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
> {{{
> Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
> first-class players have at least 14 props.
> }}}
I think that the intent is
{
For some constant K, award K props to each first class player; choose
the s
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:32 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Fuel Up (AI=1)
> {{{
> Award sufficient props to each first-class player such that all
> first-class players have at least 14 props.
> }}}
Do props actually exist? I can't find them in the online version of the
ruleset anywhere, I tho
7 matches
Mail list logo