On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
> Have you ever played play-by-post mafia?
Nope, though we've participated in live werewolf games that would
appear to be essentially identical.
--Wes
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:20 PM, wrote:
>
> E just submitted a proposal, which is one such action; there are others.
It would be trivial to enable Golems to submit Proposals.
It is somewhat less trivial to penetrate the vague hand-waving of
"there are others" to identify what other actions, if a
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> >
> > I must say, I'm somewhat alarmed by the recent flood of using "we" to
> mean
> > "I." It's a good thing we're in a Gerontocracy.
>
> We've been doing that in Nomic-related post
E just submitted a proposal, which is one such action; there are others.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 2, 2013, at 2:55 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>>
>> Also, because of Bucky, our resident participating non-player. Giving
>> him control of seco
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > > These acronyms are all in the rules. VC stands for voting credit. VVLOP
> > > doesn't officially stand for anything.
> >
> > VVLOP is defined in
On 4/2/13 13:40 , Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>>> These acronyms are all in the rules. VC stands for voting credit. VVLOP
>>> doesn't officially stand for anything.
>>
>> VVLOP is defined in Rules 2389
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > These acronyms are all in the rules. VC stands for voting credit. VVLOP
> > doesn't officially stand for anything.
>
> VVLOP is defined in Rules 2389-2390.
Well, yeah. However, what does VVLOP *mea
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> These acronyms are all in the rules. VC stands for voting credit. VVLOP
> doesn't officially stand for anything.
VVLOP is defined in Rules 2389-2390.
thanks aaron and in response to the first part of that it doesn't do me
justice with this visual impairement of mine
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> > > I create the fol
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I create the following promise, GVC:
> >
> > Text:
> > I spend 1 VC to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by one.
> > [eight times]
>
> If I cash this, my VVLOP will go all the way up to 12 and so
>
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
> I must say, I'm somewhat alarmed by the recent flood of using "we" to mean
> "I." It's a good thing we're in a Gerontocracy.
We've been doing that in Nomic-related posts for over a decade now. :)
--Wes
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> Also, because of Bucky, our resident participating non-player. Giving
> him control of second-class players is one of the main means via which
> he participates.
As far as we can tell, there are currently no actions e can take via
second-clas
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 12:52 -0700, Wes Contreras wrote:
> Can anyone explain why Second-Class Players exist? Because they
> significantly complicate the Rules without any apparent benefit.
>
> It occurred to us that perhaps we should ask before drafting Proposals
> to remove them.
Basically they'
I must say, I'm somewhat alarmed by the recent flood of using "we" to mean
"I." It's a good thing we're in a Gerontocracy.
These acronyms are all in the rules. VC stands for voting credit. VVLOP
doesn't officially stand for anything.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
> can you clarify those acronyms for me
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM
can you clarify those acronyms for me
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> > I create the following promise, GVC:
> >
> > Text:
> > I spend 1 VC to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by one.
> > [eight times]
>
> If I cash
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I create the following promise, GVC:
>
> Text:
> I spend 1 VC to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by one.
> [eight times]
If I cash this, my VVLOP will go all the way up to 12 and so
everyone's VVLOP will be reset to 4.
—Machiavelli
Hi Joe,
The current ruleset is at
https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/current_flr.txt. Trading cards
are defined in Rule 2385.
Also, are you a player? Most of the game mechanics require a person to
register before participating.
—Machiavelli
18 matches
Mail list logo
