On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
> Do you contend that an infinite recursion is the only means by which
> the truth value of an inquiry CFJ cannot be determined? If so, we
> contend that you lack imagination, but would prefer not to demonstrate
> such a thing until we can do s
On Wed, 15 May 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On May 15, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > This looks good to me. My only complaint is that "Victory Condition of
> > Victory" is kind of a weird name. One idea could be "Victory Condition of
> > XX."
>
> Aw man. "Victory Condition of Vic
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:37 PM, omd wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
>>> Proposal 7434 (AI=3, Ordinary) by omd
>>> Fifty-Nine Thirty-Seven
>>
>> We vote AGAINST. We find victory by paradox to still be quite possible.
>
> How so?
Do you contend that an infinite recu
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
>> Proposal 7434 (AI=3, Ordinary) by omd
>> Fifty-Nine Thirty-Seven
>
> We vote AGAINST. We find victory by paradox to still be quite possible.
How so?
On May 15, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> While I think the sentence I applied was ultimately reasonable, it looks
> like my purposefully satirical linear logic to point out the complete
> lack of consistency in the current sentencing rules was reasonably
> illustrative :).
>
> [It was
On May 15, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> This looks good to me. My only complaint is that "Victory Condition of
> Victory" is kind of a weird name. One idea could be "Victory Condition of XX."
Aw man. "Victory Condition of Victory" was one of my favorite things about
contests. But if
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> 2. Blots (new name, please!) are a currency of negativity,
Demerits. Stains. Sins. Vices.
Or maybe Stain Induced by Negativity (SIN).
Just brainstorming.
> Advantage: Consistently applied, it's a good Stick for actually keeping up,
> no
On Wed, 15 May 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> This looks good to me. My only complaint is that "Victory Condition of
> Victory"
> is kind of a weird name. One idea could be "Victory Condition of XX."
Yah, make it something that will look good in the Herald's Report. "Reunion"?
"Jubilee"? -
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
> {
>
> Enact a Rule with the following text:
>
> Agora's Twentieth Birthday shall be known as the Vigintennial.
> The Comptroller of the Lord Chamberlain's Office is an office;
> its holder is responsible for organising th
On Wed, 15 May 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 14 May 2013, at 23:29, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > My argument was on the point of don't appeal this because you think
> > some destroying an arbitrary amount of an easily-destroyed currency
> > is somehow a 'more deserved' punishment, because right n
On Tue, 14 May 2013, Wes Contreras wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:59 PM, omd wrote:
> >
> > Considering that Making My Eyes Bleed was originally adopted at
> > Class-6, and ehird was sentenced to TIME OUT for a Class-14 Crime, I
> > wouldn't put much stock in the Classes at all.
>
> Or perh
On 15 May 2013 15:14, "Jonathan Rouillard"
wrote:
> In rule 2369, "Foreign Relations", replace "Hostile, and Abandoned"
> with "Hostile, Abandoned and Over".
Sneakily removing the Oxford comma
-- Walker
As of approximately May 10, OmNomNomic has ceased to exist (or, at least,
stopped being played):
http://www.reddit.com/r/omnomnomic/comments/1e1q5i/the_end/
—Machiavelli
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> It used to be that the class of crime was directly proportional to the
> default punishment, and that judges could argue the punishment up or
> down from the default.
Indeed. We were there for that. :)
--Wes
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 21:06 -0700, Wes Contreras wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:59 PM, omd wrote:
> >
> > Considering that Making My Eyes Bleed was originally adopted at
> > Class-6, and ehird was sentenced to TIME OUT for a Class-14 Crime, I
> > wouldn't put much stock in the Classes at all.
On 14 May 2013, at 23:29, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> My argument was on the point of don't appeal this because you think
> some destroying an arbitrary amount of an easily-destroyed currency
> is somehow a 'more deserved' punishment, because right now we have
> really no reasonable way to place a relat
16 matches
Mail list logo
