On May 26, 2013 9:23 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:22 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
For each of G., Murphy, Roujo, scshunt, and woggle, I create two
promises and transfer them to them, as follows:
Text: I spend one VC to increase the casher's VVLOP by one.
NttPF.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I spend 2 VCs to increase omd's VVLOP by 2.
I cash two copies of that promise.
-scshunt
Oh, and please specify what you're paying the cost for, while we wait for the
relevant CFJ.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:03 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, and please specify what you're paying the cost for, while we wait for
the relevant CFJ.
Sent from my iPhone
Too late. Care to fulfill the promise manually in case?
-scshunt
Ah, trying to use crypto to do simultaneous moves.
Simultaneous votes on some things can be way more interesting, for
instance in prisoner's dilemma type situations. Otherwise the
advantage goes to whoever's checking the mailing list closest to the
deadline.
Now, am I mistaken that the
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Campaign Speech:
I gently chastise scshunt for sending an 837kb message to the lists.
- The Distributor
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:35 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
Too late. Care to fulfill the promise manually in case?
If I have not increased scshunt's VVLOP in the last 24 hours, I spend
two VCs to increase
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, am I mistaken that the initiator is also a participant? If so it seems
you've effectively made em a biased manager. Nothing prevents em and eir
allies from watching the turn while it's in progress, and it would not be
8 matches
Mail list logo
