DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Appeal 3365a assigned to Ienpw III, woggle, Yally

2013-07-23 Thread James Beirne
>but that we also wish to avoid making a decision on sentencing on our own Is that not exactly what the text of rule 911 states we should do?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, Appeal 3365a

2013-07-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, omd wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Tanner Swett wrote: > > I object to this judgement of OVERRULE. > > Gratuitous: For the record, I think that scshunt's offense is not even > close to the levels of negligence various officers have shown over the > years; alth

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, Appeal 3365a

2013-07-23 Thread omd
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Tanner Swett wrote: > I object to this judgement of OVERRULE. Gratuitous: For the record, I think that scshunt's offense is not even close to the levels of negligence various officers have shown over the years; although this has largely been during lulls, as exce

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, Appeal 3365a

2013-07-23 Thread James Beirne
My ruling was based on rule 911, which states, in part: >OVERRULE with a valid replacement judgement for the prior >case, appropriate if the prior judgement was inappropriate in >the prior case and the replacement judgement is appropriate >for the prior case; the re

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, Appeal 3365a

2013-07-23 Thread Tanner Swett
I object to this judgement of OVERRULE. I think that since OVERRULE is not subject to oversight, it should not be used to introduce new opinions, but rather only to affirm existing opinions (presumably implementing the judgement suggested by the appellant, or some such), or to effect a judgement

DIS: Proto: Tyop O Increment

2013-07-23 Thread Michael Slone
I haven't gotten very far into the ruleset, so this proto will probably grow a bit. (I sure hope it does.) -- Protoproposal h0140 (AI=2) Tyop O Increment I had started writing a Proposal fixing *all* the "spelling errors", thinking I would be the MIGHTY CLEANER of the Rule

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Sensei] What's going on in Okinawa? Now with labelled axes!

2013-07-23 Thread Charles Walker
On 23 Jul 2013 15:09, "Benjamin Schultz" wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Charles Walker < charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> SENSEI'S STONE REPORT >> >> This report: 20 Jul 2013 >> Last report: 12 Jul 2013 >> >> RECENT EVENTS >> ...- > > >> >> Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:

DIS: Re: BUS: Election!

2013-07-23 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Elliott Hird < penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I nominate myself, with a salary of Graham's number G Yaks. > Good luck on recording THAT in the reports. -- OscarMeyr

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7530-7547

2013-07-23 Thread Charles Walker
On 22 Jul 2013 21:39, "omd" wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:23 PM, omd wrote: > > [18 proposals] > > So what are we really trying to achieve in limiting proposals to MI? > Is it largely just a cash sink, or are we really trying to delay a > potentially large number of proposals for a week in