On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
This is a really long proposal that makes a heck of a lot of changes, some of
which I disagree with; I'd almost certainly vote AGAINST it, or any similar
proposal, unless it were broken into something like a dozen
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:30 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
00:53 tswett If a rule were to say if it is POSSIBLE to do X, then
it is POSSIBLE to do Y, I think we would treat
this as meaning something very different from if it
is IMPOSSIBLE to do Y, then it is POSSIBLE to do
It occurs to me that r101 could function as much as a mini-FAQ as anything.
For example, the r101(i) right but no ability has no actual teeth, but was
written to attempt to make clear that ISID is a fallacy so to head off that most
common of errors.
Though obviously, it's still a bit opaque on
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/08/2013 2:53 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
This is a Public message.
Having received no objections, I flip the Publicity of
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org mailto:agora-busin...@agoranomic.org and
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Rulekeepor to publish the Full Logical
Ruleset, which is shamefully overdue.
Can't you just go ahead and Assume the office? Or does that rule not
really exist.
If the Switchy Hypothesis is
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone please give me a counterargument to When created,
switches have their default values == new switches have their
default values?
Rule 1586.
http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-discussion@agoranomic.org/msg26317.html
Proto: the vote collector can end a vote early with support of all
(other) eligible voters; by announcement if e is the only eligible voter
or if there are none.
Don't have time to figure out how to write this one out just now. Do
feel free to submit as your own.
Cheers
-Dan
On 6 August 2013 13:23, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
Proto: the vote collector can end a vote early with support of all (other)
eligible voters; by announcement if e is the only eligible voter or if there
are none.
Don't have time to figure out how to write this one out just now. Do feel
The Tutor is an office whose holdor is responsible for maintaining the
Tutorial. The Tutor CAN edit the Tutorial at any time, and SHOULD do
so as necessary to keep it current and accurate. The Tutor also SHALL
make sure the current text of the Tutorial is easy for prospective
players to find.
The
On 6 August 2013 16:57, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
The Tutor is an office whose holdor is responsible for maintaining the
Tutorial. The Tutor CAN edit the Tutorial at any time, and SHOULD do
so as necessary to keep it current and accurate. The Tutor also SHALL
make sure the current
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 August 2013 16:57, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
The Tutor is an office whose holdor is responsible for maintaining the
Tutorial. The Tutor CAN edit the Tutorial at any time, and SHOULD do
so as
all i have to say on that is FINALLY
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 August 2013 16:57, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
The Tutor is an office whose holdor is
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal (AI=2): {{ Fool is de-registered. }}
AGAINST. We still love you ;p
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 10:24 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote:
The above is intended primarily to weigh in on the subject of the
success of Fool's scam. However, just in case it was buggy (case 2 or
4 above), I submit the following
On 6 August 2013 22:08, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
AGAINST because this is a substantive change that shouldn't get free
distribution
You're in favour of stricter Distributability?
I'd really appreciate some feedback on the following, in particular
whether the ###-delimited section should be removed or not, but also
generally.
--- A PLAYERS' GUIDE TO THE GAME OF AGORA ---
Table of Contents
-
I.What is nomic?
II. What is Agora?
III. The Mailing Lists
I'd also appreciate any comments on this, which is obviously related
to the Players' Guide post. H. Rulekeepor, Max Schutz, what do you
think of the ruleset formats?
Helpfulness
AI 1
PF 40
Append to Rule 1681 (The Logical Rulesets):
The Helpful Logical Ruleset (HLR) is a format of the
it's good btw did you get my critiquing on your beginners guide
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
I'd also appreciate any comments on this, which is obviously related
to the Players' Guide post. H. Rulekeepor, Max Schutz, what do you
think of the
On 6 August 2013 22:35, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
it's good btw did you get my critiquing on your beginners guide
Yes, thank you.
On 2013-08-06, Charles Walker wrote:
I'd really appreciate some feedback on the following, in particular
whether the ###-delimited section should be removed or not, but also
generally.
I think the ###-delimited section should be kept.
Some minor nits:
A
oh jeez comex you just had to make a reference to tub thumping
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:58 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
I lean.
(on comex)
I get knocked down. But I get up again.
wait why are you cfj'ing this
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On 6 August 2013 22:58, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
I lean.
(on comex)
I get knocked down.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
wait why are you cfj'ing this
Because that is the customary way of resolving matters of ambiguity.
On 6 August 2013 23:55, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
wait why are you cfj'ing this
Because that is the customary way of resolving matters of ambiguity.
And because it's fun!
For some people.
i realize craig this is the response to ambiguity but it seemed like a
straight forward move so to speak
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On 6 August 2013 23:55, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Max Schutz
wait we have to re-register again
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:14 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
I register.
I also register, on the very remote chance that this actually does
anything.
--
ais523
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
wait we have to re-register again
No.
Well, not unless Wooble.
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:24 -0400, Max Schutz wrote:
wait we have to re-register again
Probably not. Wooble thinks we do, but I'm not sure if anyone else
agrees with em.
One common problem with nomic is that people disagree as to what the
state of things is.
--
ais523
Two of the lists are backups in case the first three go down (yeah, we
take things very seriously)
we take things very seriously might be a bit intimidating for new
players. I also think it;s worth mentioning the irc channel.
- Ien
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Michael Slone
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
To subscribe to the mailing lists, go to http://agoranomic.org/ which
has links to all five lists.
I would really like to decrease the burden of this, incidentally.
V. The Rules
But first, a brief interlude
30 matches
Mail list logo
