I apologize, what's going on? I'm new.
On 4/22/14 at 1:10am, Pavitra wrote:
> On 04/21/2014 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > AGAINST. Under current rule allowing vacancy grabbing, makes for
> > trivial wins with a race.
>
> Worse, it's possible to win arbitrarily many times in the same message
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I deputize for the Arbitor to assign the below case CFJ 3405 and
> assign the case to myself (G.).
You can't, as the "time limit by which the rules require the action to
be performed" has not expired yet.
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I deputize for the Arbitor to assign the below case CFJ 3405 and
> > assign the case to myself (G.).
>
> You can't, as the "time limit by which the rules require the action to
> be performed" has not expi
Not I.
On Apr 22, 2014 3:56 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, omd wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
> > > I deputize for the Arbitor to assign the below case CFJ 3405 and
> > > assign the case to myself (G.).
> >
> > You can't, as the "time limit
On 2014-04-22 14:16, Sean Hunt wrote:
Not I.
On Apr 22, 2014 3:56 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
[...]
In the interests of time, would anyone greatly object (or try to
jump into) me making this assignment in a week? If not, I'll
research/write a judgement this week.
-G.
Nor I
--
Sprocklem
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Pavitra wrote:
> Worse, it's possible to win arbitrarily many times in the same message.
In lieu of assumption, I don't think so, depending on your
interpretation of Rule 2160.
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote:
I apologize, what's going on? I'm new.
They're voting on a proposal for fixing a bug in one of the rules for how
to win the game, but they don't seem to agree that the new version is bug
free. :)
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On 4/22/14 at 1:10am, Pavitra wrot
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote:
>> I apologize, what's going on? I'm new.
> They're voting on a proposal for fixing a bug in one of the rules for how to
> win the game, but they don't seem to agree that the new version is bug free.
>
On 2014-04-22 07:45, x1122334455 wrote:
I apologize, what's going on? I'm new.
You should probably register and read/skim the ruleset if you wish to
participate.
--
Sprocklem
I don't know when you registered to the list, but here is a link to
the most recent ruleset : http://agora.qoid.us/current_slr.txt
Since it's last update, this change have been made to the rules :
Proposal: Missing Vote (AI=2)
{{{
Append "The holder of the office of Speaker has voting strength on
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Khoyo wrote:
> Since it's last update, this change have been made to the rules :
>
> Proposal: Missing Vote (AI=2)
> {{{
> Append "The holder of the office of Speaker has voting strength one
> greater than e would have if e did not hold the office." to Rule 103.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
