On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 15:00 -0400, omd wrote:
> I intend to deputise for the Dungeon Master to publish eir report.
That was probably a strategic mistake, given that your main hope of this
working would be for me to forget. (I hadn't forgotten, though.)
--
ais523
DM
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 15:00 -0400, omd wrote:
>> I intend to deputise for the Dungeon Master to publish eir report.
>
> That was probably a strategic mistake, given that your main hope of this
> working would be for me to forget. (I hadn't forgot
On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 00:15 -0400, omd wrote:
> Dungeon Master ais523?? 30 Sep 14 -
[snip]
> 30 Sep 14 19:31 ais523 purportedly becomes Dungeon Master by R2426
I thought it was uncontroversial that I'm the DM. Your scam didn't in
any way prevent me becoming the DM; it's just that if it
On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 05:31 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 00:15 -0400, omd wrote:
> > Dungeon Master ais523?? 30 Sep 14 -
> [snip]
> > 30 Sep 14 19:31 ais523 purportedly becomes Dungeon Master by R2426
> I thought it was uncontroversial that I'm the DM. Your scam did
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I thought it was uncontroversial that I'm the DM. Your scam didn't in
> any way prevent me becoming the DM; it's just that if it worked, I have
> no benefit from being the DM other than office pay.
If any of the R2437 amendments succeeded, Dung
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Aha, I see the controversy, but your question marks are in the wrong
> place. If the office exists, I uncontroversially hold it. But some
> resolutions from your scam cause the office itself to be nonexistent.
Yeah, I'm tired.
6 matches
Mail list logo
