On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 21:45 -0500, omd wrote: > Ditto - the previous proposal added a "Scorekeeper" but not a "Scorekeepor".
I was going to call the "variations in spelling or dialect" rule on you, but it seems to have been repealed (or at least, I can't find it in the ruleset). That might make quite a difference to some precedents. The closest is the "inconsequential variation in the quotation of an existing rule" clause in R105, which might make this succeed anyway. -- ais523
