DIS: Re: BUS: political season begins

2015-04-20 Thread omd
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Edward Murphy wrote: > Election Frequency (AI = 2, please) > > Amend Rule 2154 (Election Procedure) by replacing this text: > > a) by announcement, if e is the IADoP, if the office has been > deputised for within the past two weeks, or if no election

Re: DIS: wording question

2015-04-20 Thread Edward Murphy
G. wrote: Opinions sought: how to phrase the following correctly? (in a power-3 rule) Winning is Secured, except as explicitly permitted in Erratic Rules. (does this successfully give power-1 Erratic rules the ability to define working winning methods while blocking others? Better phr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Protest

2015-04-20 Thread Michael Norrish
More like a Spoonerism. Michael > On 19 Apr 2015, at 09:54, omd wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Jonathan Rouillard > wrote: >> A Writ of FAGE is a "Writ of Fugere Agorae Grandissima Exprobratione", from >> Rule 1789. I don't think I was around when it first came about, but I think

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset

2015-04-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Luis Ressel wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:31:55 -0700 (PDT) > Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Rule 2446: The Agoran Newspaper > > Rule 2437/1 (Power=1) > > First of all, thanks for taking care of this! But could you please try > and avoid superfluous whitespace such as

DIS: wording question

2015-04-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
Opinions sought: how to phrase the following correctly? (in a power-3 rule) Winning is Secured, except as explicitly permitted in Erratic Rules. (does this successfully give power-1 Erratic rules the ability to define working winning methods while blocking others? Better phrasing?)

Re: DIS: PROTO: Organizations

2015-04-20 Thread Edward Murphy
aranea wrote: Also, does someone have an idea for a Patent Title we could "award" to bankrupt players? Welsher.

Re: DIS: What happened to Organizations?

2015-04-20 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2015-04-19 at 16:41 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote: > I finally got around to reading the "Organizations" thread from last > December, which seems to have died after it dissolved into a discussion > about randomness. I know stadjer was planning to revive it, but there > haven't been any news from