On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 02:53 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote:
> In the case that it actually is stalwart, then, yeah. Vote for it or we
> won't have proposals for a while, because there is no cash to actually pend
> anything with (in fact, not voting for it could be criminal, for the same
> reason that the
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 19:21 -0400, omd wrote:
> ..off-topic: I wonder if ais523 still takes the position (as e wrote
> in 2897) that CFJ judgements are generally "fraught with danger" of
> "getting the wrong result", i.e. disregarding the meta-rule of
> deferring to judge's interpretations where re
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Just as a note, I think 2895 was a Trial on something unrelated, and scshunt
> supplied gratuitous arguments for 2897, while accidentally calling them
> arguments for 2895. And those arguments got stuck with 2895 in the log. So
> currently, t
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Yah, I'm looking and I haven't found it. So right now it's just a
> > "what I think I remember" thing. FWIW, the logic I remember is that
> > Subject lines are like quotes in replies: they get repeated an
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Yah, I'm looking and I haven't found it. So right now it's just a
> "what I think I remember" thing. FWIW, the logic I remember is that
> Subject lines are like quotes in replies: they get repeated and replied
> to and aren't part of the text
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, omd wrote:
>> There's no law,
>> for example, that we have to care about the true Platonic gamestate,
>> no law that if we discover something's been done wrong (and not
>> mitigated through rule-defined mechanisms such as r
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 01:27 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal:
> >
> > Title: Caseload
> > AI: 2
> > {{{
> >
> > Amend rule 991 (“Calls for Judgement”) and remove the sentence
> >
> > The Arbitor SHALL assign judges ove
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 01:27 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Caseload
> AI: 2
> {{{
>
> Amend rule 991 (“Calls for Judgement”) and remove the sentence
>
> The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all
> interested players have reasonably equ
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 12:11 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> We had switch switches before (and acknowledged their infinite nature)
> and we're saved in reporting by the fact that other than the top set,
> they're all in default:
> That officer's (weekly, if not specified
>
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, omd wrote:
> There's no law,
> for example, that we have to care about the true Platonic gamestate,
> no law that if we discover something's been done wrong (and not
> mitigated through rule-defined mechanisms such as ratification), we
> have to go back and recalculate everyt
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Edward Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> > > Internet messaging standards (RFC 2822) allow up to 998 characters in
> > > a subject line. Gmail and other web clients usually truncate around
> > > 255. Considering that, is allowing r
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Title: Caseload
> AI: 2
> {{{
>
> Amend rule 991 (“Calls for Judgement”) and remove the sentence
>
> The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all interested
> players
> have reasonably equal opportunities to judge.
> }}}
>
> An A
12 matches
Mail list logo
