Re: DIS: CFJ 3529 numbering?

On Tue, 1 Aug 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > How should we fix this? Just finding an unused number for one of the > > CFJs? > > I think so. In searching, I can't find that either statement has been > judged, and both judgements are over a month overdue, so it can be > changed during reassignment.

Re: DIS: CFJ 3529 numbering?

On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 17:00 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Hi ais523, > > > > CFJ 3529 was assigned to Sprocklem on 20 Jun 2017, and the > > same number used for a different CFJ statement assigned to > > Quazie on 27 Jun 2017. > > > > Has this been cl

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3513 Judged TRUE by Quazie

On 08/01/2017 06:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3513 (This document is informational only and contains no game actions). == CFJ 3513 = In a message dated Mon, 22 May 2017 15:31

Re: DIS: CFJ 3529 numbering?

On Aug 1, 2017 7:10 PM, "Alex Smith" wrote: On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 17:00 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Hi ais523, > > CFJ 3529 was assigned to Sprocklem on 20 Jun 2017, and the > same number used for a different CFJ statement assigned to > Quazie on 27 Jun 2017. > > Has this been cleared up (I saw

Re: DIS: CFJ 3529 numbering?

On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 17:00 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Hi ais523, > > CFJ 3529 was assigned to Sprocklem on 20 Jun 2017, and the > same number used for a different CFJ statement assigned to > Quazie on 27 Jun 2017. > > Has this been cleared up (I saw some traffic on incorrect CFJ > numbers, b

DIS: CFJ 3529 numbering?

Hi ais523, CFJ 3529 was assigned to Sprocklem on 20 Jun 2017, and the same number used for a different CFJ statement assigned to Quazie on 27 Jun 2017. Has this been cleared up (I saw some traffic on incorrect CFJ numbers, but none are coming up in my search in reference to 3529). -G.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Uh oh

On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:34 PM, V.J Rada wrote: > > Using AP damn it, using AP. > > > > We should probably add a default, or this is going to keep happening. You might consider making CFJ creation/assignment pragmatic, the way Proposal Distribution

DIS: Re: BUS: Shiny Smuggling (Again)

On 08/01/2017 12:48 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: On Jul 30, 2017, at 3:06 PM, Nic Evans > wrote: Everything in the last attempt failed because I never had any shinies, stamps did not exist, and the mechanisms of ASaAA refered to were void at that time. So here they are

Re: DIS: Uh oh

On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 05:17 +, Aris Merchant wrote: > I think there's a scamable hole in the rule "Rewards". It says that the > reward for "Publishing a duty-fulfilling report" is "5 shinies". If you CoE > your own report, then it's your duty to revise it. The revision is also a > report, and i

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

> On Jul 30, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > Thank you! I missed his reregistration. I only saw the one from May. This > clears things up. I’m intensely glad nobody mentioned this on -business, or called my attention to it in any way, until AFTER Proposal 7867

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Weekly Report

>Arguably, the disrespect is part of the newspaper name, and thus under point >1, not 3. I share this interpretation. Only the editorialization is required to be respectful, not the title. In any case "I can't believe I get paid for this" is hardly disrespectful. On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:11 PM

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Weekly Report

> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:03 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> >>> On Jul 30, 2017, at 11:43 PM, V.J Rada wrote: >>> >>> Title: I can't believe I get paid for this Weekly Times. >>> >>> Reportor notices own position is sinecure

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Weekly Report

On Tue, 1 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: On Jul 30, 2017, at 11:43 PM, V.J Rada wrote: Title: I can't believe I get paid for this Weekly Times. Reportor notices own position is sinecure, refuses to work--- This is awfully close to violating one of the requirements of thi

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Weekly Report

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Jul 30, 2017, at 11:43 PM, V.J Rada wrote: >> >> Title: I can't believe I get paid for this Weekly Times. >> >> Reportor notices own position is sinecure, refuses to >> work--- > > This is awfully close to violating

DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Weekly Report

> On Jul 30, 2017, at 11:43 PM, V.J Rada wrote: > > Title: I can't believe I get paid for this Weekly Times. > > Reportor notices own position is sinecure, refuses to > work--- This is awfully close to violating one of the requirements of this office: > The Reportor's week