> On Nov 20, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Josh T wrote:
>
> I collect a reward of 5 Shinies for the quoted report, and if I
> successfully had collected said reward, pay VJ Rada 5 Shinies as per
> contract.
Unfortunately, you did not, and therefore did not. My apologies for this
heinous lapse.
-o
sig
Ya I was just going to give myself a win and put Smash Mouth All Star
in the ruleset for a while for that exact reason: an absurd
dictatorship would be disastrous at this point.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>>
>>> AGAINST
> On Nov 19, 2017, at 11:40 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> On the off chance that this works, I claim a 5 shiny reward from Agora
> for my Promotor report.
Close! But Agora had four shinies, not five.
-o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
>> AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction
>
>>6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision.
>
>> to
>
>>6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision.
>
>> which is obvious nonsense.
>
>AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction
> 6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision.
>to
> 6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision.
>which is obvious nonsense.
DARN. Knew I should have bribed you again.
Alright show's over boys
On Nov 19, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> AP-CFJ: "If a proposal specifies an amendment to a rule consisting of
>> multiple parts, one of which is a title change, then the entire amendment
>> fails."
>
> This is CFJ 3599.
>
>
>> Shiny-CFJ: "If a proposal specifies to "amend" a rule b
I missed it :(
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 at 21:07 Madeline wrote:
> I said this ages ago and no one believed me!
>
>
> On 2017-11-21 12:33, VJ Rada wrote:
> > "Rule 2531/0 (Power=1.0)
> > Referee Accountability
> > History:
> > Enacted by Proposal 7934 "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ" (天火狐), Nov 06,
> >
I said this ages ago and no one believed me!
On 2017-11-21 12:33, VJ Rada wrote:
"Rule 2531/0 (Power=1.0)
Referee Accountability
History:
Enacted by Proposal 7934 "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ" (天火狐), Nov 06,
2017"
Obviously, it was not enacted by that proposal. The actual rule
"Poetry Duel C
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 at 20:33 VJ Rada wrote:
> "Rule 2531/0 (Power=1.0)
> Referee Accountability
> History:
> Enacted by Proposal 7934 "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ" (天火狐), Nov 06,
> 2017"
>
> Obviously, it was not enacted by that proposal. The actual rule
> "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ" is listed
You shouldn't feel ashamed, it's just the rules.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:07 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Nope! The fine has to be levied. E can pay the money if e wants to pay
> it, but that doesn't satisfy any obligation. There's only an
> obligation to pay if the fine is levied.
>
> On Tue, Nov 21,
Nope! The fine has to be levied. E can pay the money if e wants to pay
it, but that doesn't satisfy any obligation. There's only an
obligation to pay if the fine is levied.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> If you want to pay it, you certainly can. V.J., you would mark it a
If you want to pay it, you certainly can. V.J., you would mark it as paid
then, right?
-Aris
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM ATMunn wrote:
> Huh. I somewhat feel like maybe players just missed it, but I guess I
> shouldn't complain about not having to pay a fine. I just don't like seeing
> it t
Huh. I somewhat feel like maybe players just missed it, but I guess I shouldn't
complain about not having to pay a fine. I just don't like seeing it there in
the Referee's report...
On 11/20/2017 8:01 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
Yes, the fines are forever unpaid. If Agora doesn't want you to pay
the fi
Yes, the fines are forever unpaid. If Agora doesn't want you to pay
the fine, you won't pay it.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:54 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> (I forgot to mention that only one player supported the intent, me)
>
>
> On 11/20/2017 7:53 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>
>> 2 things:
>> first of all, in my n
(I forgot to mention that only one player supported the intent, me)
On 11/20/2017 7:53 PM, ATMunn wrote:
2 things:
first of all, in my next ADoP report, should I just note this as one report or
a report and a revision?
Also, 14 days have passed since your intent to levy fines on me and Alexis.
2 things:
first of all, in my next ADoP report, should I just note this as one report or
a report and a revision?
Also, 14 days have passed since your intent to levy fines on me and Alexis.
Here's the problem: Rule 2506 states that
"When a Blue Card is issued, as a penalty, within the next 7 da
Really nice to finally put back a requirement to track theses! (even
if it's just a SHOULD) It's nobody's job now, a long time ago it used
to be the Rulekeepor funnily enough:
> The Rulekeepor shall retain a copy of each Thesis approved by
> its Thesis Committee.
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017
darnit, I was just about to point my finger at em. :P
On 11/20/2017 7:13 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
I issue 天火狐 a Green Card by Summary Judgement for not publishing a Reportor
report last week. This would be a green card anyway, but note the
mitigating circumstance: I agreed to write eir reports.
I was honestly pretty tempted to, but about to become Clork and that
seems hectic enough :P
On 2017-11-21 03:10, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
Office Holder Since Last Election
-
I contracted to do it (or not to do it, but to informally do it and have
Fire-Fox publish it).
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:50 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> How is it your fault?
>
>
> On 11/20/2017 3:08 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
>> Reportor 天火狐 8 Days 2017-11-19
>>>
>>
>> Oh g
How is it your fault?
On 11/20/2017 3:08 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
Reportor 天火狐 8 Days 2017-11-19
Oh god this is my fault isn't it. Oh dear.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:39 AM, ATMunn wrote:
You may notice that this week's ADoP report looks a bit different!
Thi
I concur. It is easy to track and you get to dive into history.
On 11/20/2017 11:10 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
>> Office Holder Since Last Election
>> --
I made great use of my campaign proposal. IDK what all these other scrubs
are doing haha.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 09:48 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > You can see how it would work better for hard
>Reportor 天火狐 8 Days 2017-11-19
Oh god this is my fault isn't it. Oh dear.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:39 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> You may notice that this week's ADoP report looks a bit different!
>
> This is because I've done a little bit of reformatting, and ad
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 09:48 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > You can see how it would work better for hard-coded matters of
> > economic policy: "if elected, I'll double the supply of land/halve
> > the cost of pending proposals" or whatever (though if most
On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 09:48 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> You can see how it would work better for hard-coded matters of
> economic policy: "if elected, I'll double the supply of land/halve
> the cost of pending proposals" or whatever (though if most of the
> campaign proposals are like that, there
Well, it's a new idea so who knows if it works well, but the idea is
it allows you to campaign on "here's a new and fresh idea for this
office that I'll implement if you elect me."
You can see how it would work better for hard-coded matters of
economic policy: "if elected, I'll double the supp
Also, what is the point of campaign proposals? (Except for proposing
overpowered powers for yourself and ensuring nobody else gets them)
Seems like tying a proposal coming into force to your being elected
will lower the chances of either happening; players who like one, but
not the other are IMO mo
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> By announcement I make all players candidates.
(this fails and does nothing)
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
> > Office Holder Since Last Election
> >
> -
> > Herald VAC
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
> Office Holder Since Last Election
> -
> Herald VACANT 2017-11-17[4] Ongoing
> ---
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Reuben Staley
> wrote:
> > 1. every player with an amount of papers less than 2 an amount of
> > papers so that eir paper balance is equal to 2.
> >
> > [ This makes it so that impoverished players can m
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > My main motivation - we've literally spent the last few months on shiny
> > bugs, ironed many out, and I'm just paranoid about going through such
> > a thing again. It's *really* good to run thro
I think that's what I had it at before, but a few people said they preferred
this way. I'm not sure what the majority of people actually want. :P
On 11/20/2017 9:44 AM, Madeline wrote:
This looks pretty cool :D
I think I prefer the consolidation number as a "diversity" percentage, but
that's j
This looks pretty cool :D
I think I prefer the consolidation number as a "diversity" percentage,
but that's just a minor quibble.
On 2017-11-21 01:39, ATMunn wrote:
You may notice that this week's ADoP report looks a bit different!
This is because I've done a little bit of reformatting, and
35 matches
Mail list logo