On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 10:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > When I wrote that rule, I (being American) specifically chose the
> > British spelling, it was kind of an experiment to see if people would
> > rigidly stick to it. I've been impressed that it
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 10:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> When I wrote that rule, I (being American) specifically chose the
> British spelling, it was kind of an experiment to see if people would
> rigidly stick to it. I've been impressed that it took this long to
> raise the question! (and I
Oh, and you'll want to pay upkeep for those building or at least collect
the materials that have piled up in there, as they would otherwise be
destroyed in two days' time.
~Corona
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:55 PM D Margaux wrote:
> Thanks Corona! And nice to meet you :-)
>
> I feel bad now
Oh, it's fine, nice to meet you too. Also, @H. Arbitor: if I'm still on the
Day Court, please remove me.
~Corona
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:55 PM D Margaux wrote:
> Thanks Corona! And nice to meet you :-)
>
> I feel bad now for blotting you earlier today. Sorry bout that.
>
> On Fri, Sep 28,
Thanks Corona! And nice to meet you :-)
I feel bad now for blotting you earlier today. Sorry bout that.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 5:54 PM D Margaux wrote:
> I act on Coronas behalf to transfer all of Coronas liquid assets to me
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 5:52 PM Corona
> wrote:
>
>> As I
I act on Coronas behalf to transfer all of Coronas liquid assets to me
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 5:52 PM Corona wrote:
> As I think I don't have the steel or whatever to pay upkeep for my
> refinery, and am too busy/bored with Agora to micromanage my other
> properties, I give permission to any
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> Oh nice. Sorry, didn’t catch that announcement.
Actually I really appreciate that others are paying attention to
the report dates and tracking/thinking about zombie gameplay!
Oh nice. Sorry, didn’t catch that announcement.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:12 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> > I intend with Notice to flip the following zombies' master switches to
> > Agora:
> >
> > Zombie Master Resale Agora was last eir
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> I intend with Notice to flip the following zombies' master switches to
> Agora:
>
> Zombie Master Resale Agora was last eir Master on
> o PSS 1 27-Jun-18 21:08:31
> Kenyon twg 1 27-Jun-18
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> Arg! For both of these CoEs, I think I meant (-3, 1)—not (1, -3). I keep
> confusing which comes first, latitude or longitude.
I work with maps a lot for a living and I still always forget that (lat,lon)
is (y,x) and not (x,y). Curse those ancient
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> Accordingly, I judge that the spelling of “Honour” as “honor” does not defeat
> the EFFECTIVEness of Trigon’s Notice of Honour.
When I wrote that rule, I (being American) specifically chose the British
spelling,
it was kind of an experiment to see if
Thank you for this. I will revise accordingly.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:16 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Just to add, because it hasn't come up since you joined, I think.
>
> When a judgement fails on "a technicality" that doesn't have to do
> with the arguments the Caller wanted addressed
I believe this case is currently “open” because Aris graciously self-moved
for reconsideration to hear my further arguments.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:33 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure where I stand, but I'm split enough on this issue (and
> others found the win pretty clear and
I'm not sure where I stand, but I'm split enough on this issue (and
others found the win pretty clear and clever) that I'd support a moot
if desired.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> I am grateful for the thoughtful consideration given by Judge Aris to the
> issues raised in this CFJ.
I am grateful for the thoughtful consideration given by Judge Aris to the
issues raised in this CFJ. I beileve there are a few sections of the
judgement that may be questionable, and I respectfully offer the following
comments to suggest that the judgement should be TRUE:
* * *
>>>What no
Just to add, because it hasn't come up since you joined, I think.
When a judgement fails on "a technicality" that doesn't have to do
with the arguments the Caller wanted addressed (like simultaneous
versus non-simultaneous when the Caller's deeper question was on
naming), we frequently accept
This addresses whether this is a valid Notice of Honour, which I agree
with. However, it doesn't address the question, which is ""This Notice
of Honour causes a player's karma to change by exactly one and then
change back."
If it causes karma to "change by one and change back" then it must
The following is a proto-judgement. Please let me know of any comments. I plan
to issue the judgement later today or tomorrow absent feedback.
***
I announce judgement that CFJ 3662 is TRUE.
Relevant Rules:
> Rule 2139/14 (The Registrar)
> The Registrar is an office; its holder is
18 matches
Mail list logo
