Votes inline
> On Nov 11, 2018, at 7:34 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 5, the votin
Ah, I see. Never mind, then.
On 11/11/2018 09:17 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
No, it's where you said "Amend Rule 2555 'Blots' by replacing the
paragraph beginning 'To Lefy a Fine' with:". So it doesn't appear in
the amended text. Furthermore, Rule 105 says that an inconsequential
misquotation in an
No, it's where you said "Amend Rule 2555 'Blots' by replacing the
paragraph beginning 'To Lefy a Fine' with:". So it doesn't appear in
the amended text. Furthermore, Rule 105 says that an inconsequential
misquotation in an amendment is ignored, so the proposal still works.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11, 20
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 8:05 PM Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2018 08:34 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:> IDAuthor(s)
> AITitle
> > ---
> > 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence
> FOR
> > 8124 Trigon
On 11/11/2018 08:52 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs
FOR. Trigon, this is one of the most beautiful changes I've seen since
I became a player. I'm not sure why I find it so elegant, but I do.
There's a typo ("lefy" instead of "levy"), but it's Rule
On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 04:32 +0100, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> > Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's
> > an old tradition but I'm not going to do it if people don't think
> > it would be useful.
> >
> > If you *do* want me to pu
Indeed; if I published them that would probably be the bulk of it, along
with the IDs of new rules.
On 11/11/2018 08:32 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's an old
tradition but I'm not going to d
Alright, fair enough. I stand corrected. We may want to clean up our
nomenclature here at some point.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 7:30 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:21 -0800, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Strictly speaking, you can CoE any document (R2201). However,
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's an old
tradition but I'm not going to do it if people don't think it would be
useful.
If you *do* want me to publish them, tell me what information you would like
me to include.
As I
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:21 -0800, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Strictly speaking, you can CoE any document (R2201). However, the
> message I sent wasn't even a document, given that it was sent to a-d.
Rule 1551 defines a public document to be part (possibly all) of a
public message. It also strongly im
Strictly speaking, you can CoE any document (R2201). However, the
message I sent wasn't even a document, given that it was sent to a-d.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:32 AM Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Just so you know, Claims of Error only work on actual reports. This is not
> a report, just a qui
Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's an old
tradition but I'm not going to do it if people don't think it would be
useful.
If you *do* want me to publish them, tell me what information you would
like me to include.
Here are a few examples from various Rulekeepors
My reading of the rules suggests that the auction ends (and the lots can be
given) without anyone announcing its end. (The announcer SHALL announce the
end, but nothing else depend on it.)
Gaelan
> On Nov 11, 2018, at 6:07 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
>
> Lol! Good bye, Nichdel. I appreciate your fa
Could you make a public statement that your scam won’t hurt the person who
joins the contract (more than anyone else, that is)?
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:20 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Fair warning: I’m actually only 50% sure it will work.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Nov 11, 2018, at 4:17 PM, Timon
Fair warning: I’m actually only 50% sure it will work.
Gaelan
> On Nov 11, 2018, at 4:17 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> I have to say, I'm really, really curious what it is you have up your
> sleeve...
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, November 12, 2018 12:11 AM
I have to say, I'm really, really curious what it is you have up your sleeve...
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, November 12, 2018 12:11 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> The quoted offer is void. New version with the actual text so that people
> know it’s not dangerous:
>
> I agree
These are CoEs, not CFJs :)
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 11, 2018 7:18 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> (Or, since D. Margaux also re-raised the issue and assigned a new
> case, these could be withdrawn).
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > I favor these
(Or, since D. Margaux also re-raised the issue and assigned a new
case, these could be withdrawn).
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I favor these.
>
> My apologies, I wrote 3/4 of the judgement in question but then real life
> clobbered me this past week - if I'm assigned I can judge
I become a candidate for Rulekeepor.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 11:34 Timon Walshe-Grey I become a candidate for Referee.
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, November 11, 2018 6:15 PM, Edward Murphy
> wrote:
>
> > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Prim
Just so you know, Claims of Error only work on actual reports. This is not
a report, just a quick question about the accuracy of the list. You might
have already known that, but I just wanted to make sure.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 11:13 Gaelan Steele CoE: there was a typo fix proposal in one of my r
CoE: there was a typo fix proposal in one of my recent vote emails. I’ll try
and find it in few.
Gaelan
> On Nov 11, 2018, at 12:55 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> Here's my draft list of proposals. If I'm missing anything, please let
> me know. Also, all ID numbers are provisional. Thank you
twg wrote:
Normally when someone seems suspiciously anxious to have something happen at a
certain time, I expect it to be intended to help em qualify for a transparent
ribbon. But I don't see any way for this proposal to inadvertently grant Gaelan
one ribbon, never mind five.
It might work
Also, you are missing "Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2":
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg32959.html
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 11, 2018 8:55 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Here's my draft list of proposals. If I'm missing anyt
Here's my draft list of proposals. If I'm missing anything, please let
me know. Also, all ID numbers are provisional. Thank you!
IDAuthor(s) AITitle
---
8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence
8124 Trig
24 matches
Mail list logo
