On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
RETIREMENT ANNOUNCEMENT
Kim Ping Pong has announced eir retirement.
To secure the stability and continued prosperity of the people, we trust
that his glorious tenure will be
We already have a way to win via coins though, I’m not too enthusiastic
about another via proxy.
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 22:48, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk <
ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 21:42 +, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> > OK, well, y'all have spoken. Personally I'm
On 2/11/2019 1:42 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> OK, well, y'all have spoken. Personally I'm not terribly enthused about
> an elimination game, but it's not up to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
To be clear, I'm personally totally cool if you want to propose that now,
and I'd probably vote for it; I just mean
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 21:42 +, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> OK, well, y'all have spoken. Personally I'm not terribly enthused
> about an elimination game, but it's not up to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
My recommendation: make spaceships purchasable (either directly or at
auction), so that people can buy back
On Sunday, February 10, 2019 5:08 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> Revoking coins isn't an abstract math operation, it's destruction of
> assets. "Revoking negative coins" can't occur, for the same reason that
> "punching the King of England" can't occur right now.
Exactly, thank you.
-twg
This did occur to me, but I figured all it did was extend the timeline a few
days. IIRC there was a CFJ a while ago - I believe in response to your antics
as well! :P - that said repeatedly retracting and re-objecting did not reapply
the Speaker veto.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On
OK, well, y'all have spoken. Personally I'm not terribly enthused about an
elimination game, but it's not up to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Treasuror and Astronomor reports will be further delayed until I get around to
figuring out which actions succeeded and which failed.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message
On Monday, February 11, 2019 6:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Agora has 1,000+ coins, and attempts to transfer coins "to the Ruleset (as a
> contract)" would either transfer the coin to Agora, or attempt to transfer
> to a nonexistent entity (leading to the question being malformed).
Don't suppose
Aaargh.
Of course, it turns out that there are probably also very many other reasons
why this fails, but that one is particularly grating. :P
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, February 10, 2019 7:17 AM, Madeline wrote:
> This fails because no intent was posted in a public
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> The current Contract definition is here in R1742:
> > Any group of two or more consenting persons (the parties) may
> > make an agreement among themselves with the intention that it be
> > binding upon them and be governed
Judgement Protos:
CFJ: "The Ruleset (as a contract) now has 1 coin."
Agreements are things people naturally make, as part of being social
animals. A game is generally a natural, social agreement to abide by a
specific set of rules for a time. Agora is, by common definition and
natural
Sorry, I've been favoring more than usual recently because, with only like 3
judges on the Court lists atm, it was about my turn anyway so why not speed
up the process. If there were more judges in regular rotation I definitely
wouldn't jump in quite so much...?
On 2/10/2019 1:35 PM, Cuddle
12 matches
Mail list logo
