DIS: Re: OFF: Another zombie auction

2019-05-09 Thread Gaelan Steele
I bid a coin as well. Gaelan > On May 9, 2019, at 6:54 AM, James Cook wrote: > > I initiate a zombie auction, with the following lots (each zombie a > separate lot) ordered as follows (highest-bid first): > > 1. V.J. Rada > 2. Telnaior > 3. L > 4. Baron von Vaderham > > Agora is the Auctionee

DIS: Re: BUS: Side-Game Suspension Act

2019-05-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
If we take this route, I think whomever revives and takes the office should be under an added penalty to stick with the office - "if a player does this, e must perform all the Astronomor duties with no late duties for at least 60 days". But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Side-Game Suspension Act

2019-05-09 Thread D. Margaux
> On May 9, 2019, at 11:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over a straight up > repeal, followed by a simple "re-enact Rules XXX, YYY" if someone wants to > bring it back? I agree it’s probably not an improvement. I mostly wrote it up this way

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Side-Game Suspension Act

2019-05-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 5/9/2019 8:21 AM, D. Margaux wrote: >> On May 9, 2019, at 11:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over a straight up >> repeal, followed by a simple "re-enact Rules XXX, YYY" if someone wants >> to bring it back? > > I agree it’s probably not

DIS: Re: BUS: Side-Game Suspension Act

2019-05-09 Thread Aris Merchant
I think for the space rules you meant rules 2593 and 2594, rather than 259. -Aris On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:02 AM D Margaux wrote: > > We should probably do something about Spaace and Politics, since there’s > little interest in them, but the rules have lots of obligations that are > going unf

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Side-Game Suspension Act

2019-05-09 Thread Aris Merchant
Oh, and you might also want to add an "in ascending numerical order" after each instance of "are automatically repealed". -Aris On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:55 PM Aris Merchant wrote: > > I think for the space rules you meant rules 2593 and 2594, rather than 259. > > > -Aris > > On Wed, May 8, 2019

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 8176

2019-05-09 Thread James Cook
> IDAuthor(s) AITitle > --- > 8176 G. 2.0 Zombies take care of this now On Proposal 8176 I vote AGAINST if a Notice of Veto has been published specifying Proposal 8176, otherwise FOR.

DIS: Re: BUS: Zombie Auction Status (unofficial report)

2019-05-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
The first one's over now right? (fwiw, I plan to bid again to keep the 2nd auction going so you can't claim two :) ) On 5/9/2019 4:53 PM, James Cook wrote: Two zombie auctions are ongoing. First auction. Initiated 2019-05-04. Lots: 1. Tarhalindur Bids: 2019-05-04 15:44 UTC. Falsif

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Zombie Auction Status (unofficial report)

2019-05-09 Thread James Cook
Oops, you're right that the first auction is over. And I'd hoped that was a new loophole I'd discovered. On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 01:31, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > The first one's over now right? > (fwiw, I plan to bid again to keep the 2nd auction going so you > can't claim two :) ) > > > On 5/9/201

DIS: Re: BUS: Side-Game Suspension Act

2019-05-09 Thread James Cook
For what it's worth, I'm interested in Spaaace!, but not enough to put time yet into assembling a new Astronomor's report when more basic officers' duties are unfilled. Is there much harm in just leaving the Astronomor office (effectively) vacant until someone finds the time? Not that I feel stron

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Side-Game Suspension Act

2019-05-09 Thread James Cook
> - "Automatic rules repeals" are a little dangerous because > if there's uncertainty as to the conditions the ruleset may change > automagically without visible trace. It's generally better to tie ruleset > changes to a required statement of change that can be hunted up in > the lists, and even b