I bid a coin as well.
Gaelan
> On May 9, 2019, at 6:54 AM, James Cook wrote:
>
> I initiate a zombie auction, with the following lots (each zombie a
> separate lot) ordered as follows (highest-bid first):
>
> 1. V.J. Rada
> 2. Telnaior
> 3. L
> 4. Baron von Vaderham
>
> Agora is the Auctionee
If we take this route, I think whomever revives and takes the office should
be under an added penalty to stick with the office - "if a player does this,
e must perform all the Astronomor duties with no late duties for at least
60 days".
But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over
> On May 9, 2019, at 11:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over a straight up
> repeal, followed by a simple "re-enact Rules XXX, YYY" if someone wants to
> bring it back?
I agree it’s probably not an improvement. I mostly wrote it up this way
On 5/9/2019 8:21 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
>> On May 9, 2019, at 11:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> But overall, I'm not sure that this is an improvement over a straight up
>> repeal, followed by a simple "re-enact Rules XXX, YYY" if someone wants
>> to bring it back?
>
> I agree it’s probably not
I think for the space rules you meant rules 2593 and 2594, rather than 259.
-Aris
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:02 AM D Margaux wrote:
>
> We should probably do something about Spaace and Politics, since there’s
> little interest in them, but the rules have lots of obligations that are
> going unf
Oh, and you might also want to add an "in ascending numerical order"
after each instance of "are automatically repealed".
-Aris
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:55 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I think for the space rules you meant rules 2593 and 2594, rather than 259.
>
>
> -Aris
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2019
> IDAuthor(s) AITitle
> ---
> 8176 G. 2.0 Zombies take care of this now
On Proposal 8176 I vote AGAINST if a Notice of Veto has been published
specifying Proposal 8176, otherwise FOR.
The first one's over now right?
(fwiw, I plan to bid again to keep the 2nd auction going so you
can't claim two :) )
On 5/9/2019 4:53 PM, James Cook wrote:
Two zombie auctions are ongoing.
First auction. Initiated 2019-05-04.
Lots:
1. Tarhalindur
Bids:
2019-05-04 15:44 UTC. Falsif
Oops, you're right that the first auction is over. And I'd hoped that
was a new loophole I'd discovered.
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 01:31, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> The first one's over now right?
> (fwiw, I plan to bid again to keep the 2nd auction going so you
> can't claim two :) )
>
>
> On 5/9/201
For what it's worth, I'm interested in Spaaace!, but not enough to put
time yet into assembling a new Astronomor's report when more basic
officers' duties are unfilled.
Is there much harm in just leaving the Astronomor office (effectively)
vacant until someone finds the time? Not that I feel stron
> - "Automatic rules repeals" are a little dangerous because
> if there's uncertainty as to the conditions the ruleset may change
> automagically without visible trace. It's generally better to tie ruleset
> changes to a required statement of change that can be hunted up in
> the lists, and even b
11 matches
Mail list logo
