On 10/23/2019 7:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 10/23/2019 4:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_izvAbhExY
>>
>> I switch my master switch to myself
>
> As I expected. :P
>
> BTW I think the safety in the last parag
On 10/23/2019 4:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_izvAbhExY
>>
>> I switch my master switch to myself
>
> As I expected. :P
>
> BTW I think the safety in the last paragraph of Rule 1885 is buggy: if you
> had done this _
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, Cuddle Beam wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_izvAbhExY
I switch my master switch to myself
As I expected. :P
BTW I think the safety in the last paragraph of Rule 1885 is buggy: if you
had done this _between_ the auction end and the winner paying, e would
still
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019, Jason Cobb wrote:
On 10/18/19 5:05 PM, Nch wrote:
When a player registers for the first time since this proposal was passed,
they enter the Popularity* Contest automatically.
Possible ambiguity: is this registration for the first time ever (that
happens to be after the p
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 4:38 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> >* players SHALL NOT clearly identify this rule - doing so is the
> > Class 1 Crime of Uttering the Forbidden Name.
> >
> > Any player CAN, without objection, exorcise
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
* players SHALL NOT clearly identify this rule - doing so is the
Class 1 Crime of Uttering the Forbidden Name.
Any player CAN, without objection, exorcise this rule (cause it to
repeal itself).
Do you envision a way for
On 10/22/2019 11:37 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2019, 01:40, Ada Worcester < ag...@ada.pikhq.com> wrote:
>> I initiate a Call for Judgement into the following: {
>> The person known as ais523 is a player.
>> }
>>
>> I bar ais523 from this case.
>
> Oh great, this is probably go
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, at 08:31, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Also, even after ais noted that they knew they weren’t registered, I
> still didn’t realize that it was a registration attempt—I assumed it
> would be some scam involving the “right now” and some sort of
> retroactive registration.
>
> Gae
Also, even after ais noted that they knew they weren’t registered, I still
didn’t realize that it was a registration attempt—I assumed it would be some
scam involving the “right now” and some sort of retroactive registration.
Gaelan
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 11:37 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 06:37, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2019, 01:40, Ada Worcester < ag...@ada.pikhq.com> wrote:
> > I initiate a Call for Judgement into the following: {
> > The person known as ais523 is a player.
> > }
> >
> > I bar ais523 from this case.
>
> Oh great, this is probabl
On 10/23/19 2:37 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Quick straw poll: did anyone actually interpret ais523's initial message as a potential
registration attempt before e started talking about it? I already have two
"noes" from myself and Gaelan.
-twg
Nope.
--
Jason Cobb
11 matches
Mail list logo
