On 10/27/2019 10:48 PM, omd wrote:
I'm keeping this proposal around as well because the other one may not
pass. However, I'm not convinced that "unobfuscated" is different
enough from "clear" to make a difference. I'll think about the
wording some more.
After a scam last year, criteria for
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 9:46 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Oh, also, well you’re at it, could you change “correctly identified” to
> “correctly and publicly identified” so that no one, like, hides the fact
> that they’ve identified it and then still claims they’ve invalidated the
> decision?
I just s
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 9:41 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 9:31 PM omd wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:31 PM Aris Merchant
> > wrote:
> > > 8265 twg, [3] 3.0 [4]
> >
> > FOR.
> >
> > Proposal: Where's my clarit
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 9:31 PM omd wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:31 PM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > 8265 twg, [3] 3.0 [4]
>
> FOR.
>
> Proposal: Where's my clarity requirement? (AI=3)
> {
> Amend Rule 107 (Initiating Agoran Decisions) by replacing:
>
> This notice
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 5:48 PM James Cook wrote:
> Our H. Distributor tried in June to enable from-address-rewriting for
> messages with this problem, but I'm not sure it worked. See for
> example my 2019-07-01 message to the discussion list [0].
>
> omd, do you have any insight on what is going
Thanks for looking into it!
Original Message
On Oct 27, 2019, 7:15 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 5:48 PM James Cook wrote:
>> Our H. Distributor tried in June to enable from-address-rewriting for
>> messages with this problem, but I'm not sure it worked. See for
>> e
test
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
On 10/27/2019 12:36 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:32 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 10/26/2019 11:30 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
8265 twg, [3] 3.0 [4]
I vote AGAINST 8265, and act on behalf of Rance to vote AGAINST.
First, the text was not included with
On 10/27/2019 12:42 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:40 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 10/26/2019 11:44 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
CoE: The proposal pool wasn't empty.
Accepted. Revision: At 23:00 UTC on October 26, the proposal pool
contained only the listed proposals.
Co
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:40 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 10/26/2019 11:44 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > CoE: The proposal pool wasn't empty.
> >
> > Accepted. Revision: At 23:00 UTC on October 26, the proposal pool
> > contained only the listed proposals.
>
> CoE on the Proposal Pool: several
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:32 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 10/26/2019 11:30 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > 8265 twg, [3] 3.0 [4]
>
> I vote AGAINST 8265, and act on behalf of Rance to vote AGAINST.
>
> First, the text was not included with the distribution. While it has been
>
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 27, 2019 2:50 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Votes inline.
>
NttPF
Votes inline.
Gaelan
> On Oct 26, 2019, at 11:31 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is
13 matches
Mail list logo
