On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 10:31 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 01:01, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 8:27 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
> > agor
> On Jan 18, 2020, at 8:34 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> Proposal: Zombie voting package (AI=3)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by appending the following
> paragraph:
> {{
> The above notwithstanding, at the end of the voting period for an Agoran
> deci
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 01:01, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 8:27 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I intend, without objection, to make the following cleanings (in
> numerical
>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 8:27 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to make the following cleanings (in numerical
> order if I do not specify otherwise when I resolve the intents):
>
> - Rules 879 and 2556 by replacing each instance
Proposal: Zombie voting package (AI=3)
{{{
Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by appending the following
paragraph:
{{
The above notwithstanding, at the end of the voting period for an Agoran
decision, prior to the evaluation of conditionals, each entity who has
never submitted a valid bal
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 7:40 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 1/16/20 10:45 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Title: Consolidated Regulatory Recordkeeping
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-authors:
> >
> > [The Rulekeepor is willing to take on this res
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 22:17, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Here's an excerpt from R2160:
>
> > 1. the rules require the holder of that office, by virtue of
> > holding that office, to perform the action (this requirement is
> >
On 1/18/20 10:07 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> I don't think you're correct; the first condition of rule 2160 is that
> the officer is required to perform the action. You would need to set
> this up would be if you could create a way that the officer could
> perform the action without discharging the
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 21:58, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Full disclosure, I think the bug that this fixes could be used for a
> scam attempt similar to the 18K scam. Specifically, I believe a person
> could find an office that missed a report a whil
Full disclosure, I think the bug that this fixes could be used for a
scam attempt similar to the 18K scam. Specifically, I believe a person
could find an office that missed a report a while ago, and then
repeatedly deputise for it, earning a Cyan ribbon an arbitrary number of
times.
I just want t
On 1/18/2020 4:13 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 2:48 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> So this judgement actually extends the concept of physical reality quite a
>> bit, by saying "even though no rule outright forbids this, we're still
>> saying it'
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 4:14 PM omd via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 2:48 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > So this judgement actually extends the concept of physical reality quite a
> > bit, by saying "even though no rule outright forbids this, we're still
>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 2:48 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> So this judgement actually extends the concept of physical reality quite a
> bit, by saying "even though no rule outright forbids this, we're still
> saying it's R106-prohibited due to our (unwritten) precedents about assets
On 1/17/2020 9:33 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> Judge's Arguments for CFJs 3784 and 3785, as well as the whimsically
> quasi-existent CFJ 3785.5
This is a clever judgement, and covers a lot of the ground well, but
honestly I feel like this is missing something. R106 reads in par
14 matches
Mail list logo
