I submit this proposal: {
Title: Calls with Memoranda
AI: 2
Co-authors: Aris, G, Alexis
Create a new Power-2 rule titled “Administrative Opinions”: {
An officer may publish an Administrative Opinion for a judicial case,
specifying a valid judgement for that case. Officers SHOULD only assign
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 3:31 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/9/2020 3:01 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I strongly oppose this. In my view, inquiry cases should generally
> > *not* be the officer making the initial
H. Assessor, the Promotorial Proposal Office is tentatively holding off on
distributing the next round of proposals until the current round is
resolved. In particular, we believe that it would be advantageous for the
Proposal 8320 to be resolved so that unassigned proposals can be referred
to
On 2/10/20 10:33 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> If the author's proposal "Clarify quorum (option 2)" has been or
> would be adopted with a greater or equal proportion of support, then
> this proposal has no effect. Otherwise:
This should probably say "(option 1)" instead of
Proto-Proposal: Standard Model of Agoran Economics
Thought of a couple things this morning:
* Judging should earn you Truth coins. (Truthiness?)
* Could do with more things to spend coins on, besides zombies and
wins. Question is, what would that be? I was going to suggest
twg wrote:
G. wrote:
On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Murphy wrote:
Alexis wrote:
I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the
following offices:
* Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
* Notary, as it is a brand new
twg wrote:
Gaelan wrote:
Crap, Jason’s bid came in as I was writing this message. I point my
finger at myself for violating rule 2550/1: {A person SHALL NOT bid on
an Auction if it would be impossible for em to pay that amount at the
conclusion of the Auction.}
Unless I'm misreading this,
G. wrote:
> On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> > Murphy wrote:
> >> Alexis wrote:
> >>
> >>> I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the
> >>> following offices:
> >>>
> >>> * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
> >>> * Notary,
On 2/10/2020 3:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Murphy wrote:
>> Alexis wrote:
>>
>>> I intend, with 2 Support, to initiate an election for each of the
>>> following offices:
>>>
>>> * Assessor, as I'm dissatisfied with the sparse content of resolutions;
>>> * Notary, as it is a brand new
9 matches
Mail list logo
