On 8/15/20 5:20 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
wrote:
> As Tailor, I see and think about everyone's glitter use. Observing it,
> some glitters seem to be frequently awarded and often to the same
> people. For Blue Glitter in particular, it's basically a second reward
> fo
For the record, I am aware that it does not prevent self-ratification. I guess
I assumed people would CoE upon seeing any assumptions at all. Would people
prefer it if I doubted all my reports immediately after posting them? If so
I'll do it; it just seemed unnecessary.
On 8/15/2020 5:54 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
Nevermind, I should probably read more than just one email before
replying like this.
>>>
>>> I called a CoE to make sure it wouldn't self-ratify. I don't think just
>>> listing the assumption does that.
>>>
>>> In the past, wh
> On Aug 15, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Test before changing the setting:
>>
>> indented 0
>> indented 1
>> indented 2
>>indented 3
>> indented 4
>
> After:
>
> indented 0
> indented 1
> indented 2
> indented 3
>indented 4
>
> -
On 2020-08-16 01:05, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Test before changing the setting:
>>
>> indented 0
>> indented 1
>> indented 2
>> indented 3
>> indented 4
>
> After:
>
> indented 0
> indented 1
> indented 2
>indented 3
> indented 4
As expected, these both look
> Test before changing the setting:
>
> indented 0
> indented 1
> indented 2
> indented 3
> indented 4
After:
indented 0
indented 1
indented 2
indented 3
indented 4
--
Falsifian
On 2020-08-10 00:33, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 00:14 +, Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
Wait, I didn't look very closely at the archive link I posted. It
looks like it has the inverse problem.
My email client: the names line up.
Gaelan's: zombie names a
On 8/15/20 8:55 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-08-16 00:09, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Sat, 2020-08-15 at 18:20 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
>> agora-discussion wrote:
>>> As Tailor, I see and think about everyone's glitter use. Observing
>>> it,
>>>
On 2020-08-16 00:09, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
On Sat, 2020-08-15 at 18:20 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
As Tailor, I see and think about everyone's glitter use. Observing
it,
some glitters seem to be frequently awarded and often to the same
people.
Nevermind, I should probably read more than just one email before
replying like this.
I called a CoE to make sure it wouldn't self-ratify. I don't think just
listing the assumption does that.
In the past, when I've published reports with assumptions like that,
I've immediately CoEed them for th
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 5:36 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-14 14:30, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
> > On 8/14/2020 10:29 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> >> On 8/13/2020 10:33 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> >>> On 2020-08-09 20:02, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote
On 2020-08-14 05:36, Byron Krane via agora-discussion wrote:
Gratuitous arguments: There is probably no lowest integer with this
property, because integers include negative numbers.
Also, hi, I'm still lurking, apparently. Hopefully adding DIS: to
title was automatic, I don't remember. (If not
On 2020-08-14 14:30, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
On 8/14/2020 10:29 AM, ATMunn wrote:
On 8/13/2020 10:33 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
On 2020-08-09 20:02, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
On Sat, 2020-08-15 at 18:20 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> As Tailor, I see and think about everyone's glitter use. Observing
> it,
> some glitters seem to be frequently awarded and often to the same
> people. For Blue Glitter in particular, it's basically a se
As Tailor, I see and think about everyone's glitter use. Observing it,
some glitters seem to be frequently awarded and often to the same
people. For Blue Glitter in particular, it's basically a second reward
for a timely judgement which exceeds the initial one. As a result, I'd
like to detach the p
On 8/15/20 5:09 PM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 8/9/20 7:21 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>> PROPOSAL 8479 (Competitive Finger Pointing v2)
>> AUTHOR: nix
>> CLASS: ORDINARY
>> CHAMBER: JUSTICE
>> SPONSORED: YES
>> FOR (7): Aris, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian, Gaelan@, Murphy, Publius
On 8/9/20 7:21 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> PROPOSAL 8479 (Competitive Finger Pointing v2)
> AUTHOR: nix
> CLASS: ORDINARY
> CHAMBER: JUSTICE
> SPONSORED: YES
> FOR (7): Aris, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian, Gaelan@, Murphy, Publius Scribonius
> Scholasticus%, nix%
> AGAINST (0):
> PRESENT (
17 matches
Mail list logo
