On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Ned Strange via agora-official wrote:
Fora
The publicity switch values (Rule 478) are self-ratifying.
PublicityLocation or description Typical use
---- ---
Public agora-official at
You can't reply to d. Wet by discussion because e won't see it, e
intentionally chooses not to subscribe to the discussion list.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021, 8:56 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/9/2021 3:13 PM, D. Wet via agora-business wrote:
> >
On 8/9/2021 3:13 PM, D. Wet via agora-business wrote:
> I will wait for the final judgement of CFJ 3922 or August 16th, which
> ever comes first, before taking the next action.
As an alternative if you want, you can sent a public message now, that
says something like "I withdraw any proposal I
2 aug. 2021 22:12:44 Jason Cobb via agora-business
:
On 8/2/21 3:02 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
It's okay to take part in conversations via BUS as long as you're
careful. I was recommending against selling Cuddlebeam your focus
grants
and victory cards.
Okay, clarification time:
* I
hi I'm still active
On 08/08/2021 20:32, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
I consent to and join the SNOCS contract (Simple, No-Opportunity-Cost
sets). (I think I was already a member.)
I Pool Cards, by doing all of the following:
{
I nominate the following four cards:
- Two of my Victory Cards.
- One of
I think this would be super awesome to have. A signed copy of the Agoran
Ruleset! Snail mail is relatively cheap too, so is paper.
I had in mind to print out several copies of the Ruleset, sign them all,
then put them all into a single package and send it to the next person to
sign them all. And
> CFJ: The quoted message is a distribution message as outlined in
> Regulation AM0.
I [proto-] deliver this judgement in CFJ 3923:
The interpretations in this judgement are made in keeping with this part
of Rule 2545/5:
> To further aid trade and
On 8/9/2021 7:36 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 8/9/21 9:17 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
>> Alright, re-Judging:
>>
>> I Judge FALSE.
>>
>> Backed by the arguments provided, I have become convinced that it is
>> possible to try to simultaneously flip a Switch.
On 8/9/21 9:17 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> Alright, re-Judging:
>
> I Judge FALSE.
>
> Backed by the arguments provided, I have become convinced that it is
> possible to try to simultaneously flip a Switch. However, doing so would
> attempt to make it an indeterminate value, and by
On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 05:38 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 8/9/2021 5:37 AM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > With support from cuddlybanana and G., I group-file a Motion to
> > Reconsider CFJ 3924.
>
> cuddlybanana's was nttpf.
So it was. In that case my attempt to
On 8/9/2021 5:37 AM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 12:45 +0100, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 13:31 +0200, Cuddle Beam via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>> I Judge FALSE.
>>
>> I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a Motion to Reconsider this;
I support this motion.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 7:46 AM ais523 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 13:31 +0200, Cuddle Beam via agora-business
> wrote:
> > Your attempt to simultaneously Flip, failed; because: CFJ 2086 (called
> 15
> > Jul 2008):
just gmail
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 5:44 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I don’t understand what you’re testing, but I do object.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Aug 8, 2021, at 10:50 PM, Sarah S. via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
