On 12/7/21 21:53, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 09:18:28PM +0000, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
>> El 06/12/2021 a las 18:51, ais523 via agora-discussion escribió:
>>> On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 19:48 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
>>> business wrote:
>>>> The dice roll was: 39
>>>> This is R2125, Regulated Actions.
>>> For reference:
>>> {{{
>>> An action is regulated if: (1) the Rules limit, allow, enable, or
>>> permit its performance; (2) the Rules describe the circumstances
>>> under which the action would succeed or fail; or (3) the action
>>> would, as part of its effect, modify information for which some
>>> player is required to be a recordkeepor.
>>> A Regulated Action CAN only be performed as described by the
>>> Rules, and only using the methods explicitly specified in the
>>> Rules for performing the given action. The Rules SHALL NOT be
>>> interpreted so as to proscribe unregulated actions.
>>> }}}
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>> An action is regulated if: (1) the devices limit, allow, enable, or permit
>> its performance; (2) the devices describe the circumstances under which the
>> action would succeed or fail; or (3) the action would, as part of its
>> effect, modify information for which some player is required to be a
>> recordkeepor.
>>
>> --
>> Trigon
> Hm... I initially was thinking this power-1 rule can't mess with the (power-3)
> definition of regulated action. But I guess the Rules are allowed to make more
> things regulated, so maybe it would work.
>
I don't think that affects the power-3 implications of actions being
"regulated", but it might mean that the power-1 rule attempts to impose
all restrictions that the definition implies?
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
