On 1/21/22 11:38, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote: > I temporarily deputise for the Arbitor to recuse Madrid from CFJ 3938. > > I point a finger at Madrid for failing to judge this cfj in a timely > fashion, as per R591. I wouldn't do this normally, but e favored it so it > seems like breaking an explicit promise to do it. > > > I temporarily deputise for the Arbitor to assign CFJ 3938 to Jason. > > > CFJ statement: The minimum number of players needed for Agora to not be > ossified is 1. > > Called by: cuddlybanana > Called on: 10 Jan 2022 10:12:08 -0500 > Assigned to: Jason (as of this message) > > [no arguments supplied] > > On 1/10/2022 7:12 AM, Rose Strong via agora-business wrote: >> I CFJ: The minimum number of players needed for Agora to not be ossified is >> 1.
Draft judgement: Per Rule 1689/6: > Agora is ossified if it is IMPOSSIBLE for any reasonable > combination of actions by players to cause arbitrary rule changes > to be made and/or arbitrary proposals to be adopted within a > four-week period. First, I find that Agora is ossified if there are 0 players. If there are 0 players, the set of "reasonable combinations of actions by players" is 0, since the empty set can perform no actions, and therefore there are no combinations of actions that can be performed (and certainly none that can cause arbitrary rule changes). This does not imply that, but for this provision, Agora would be forever locked if it reached 0 players. A non-player could register and then perform actions, but AIAN does not consider that possibility when determining if Agora is ossified. Next, let's consider the case of a single player. The following is a set of actions performable by a single player that result in arbitrary rule changes under the current rules: 1. Ratify without objection that "Hillary Rodham Clinton is a player." Ratification is at power 3.1 and overpowers the restriction on consent in Rule 869/48. 2. Ratify without objection that "There exists a proposal in the Proposal Pool with id 99998, AI 1, author Hillary Rodham Clinton, title 'Do Nothing', no coauthors, democratic class, and empty text." 3. Publish the following message: "I hereby resolve the Agoran decision on whether to adopt Proposal 99998. It has no voters, and outcome FAILED QUORUM." This will self-ratify such a decision into existence (and that it was resolved) under Rule 2034/12, thus setting quorum to its minimum of 2. 4. Wait 7 days for self-ratification. 5. Ratify without objection that "There exists a proposal in the Proposal Pool with id 99999, AI 3, author Hillary Rodham Clinton, title 'Do Everything', no coauthors, democratic class, and text [whatever is necessary]." 6. Publish the following message: "I hereby resolve the Agoran decision on whether to adopt Proposal 99999. It has two voters (me and Hillary Rodham Clinton) both voting FOR, and outcome ADOPTED." This will self-ratify such a decision into existence, that it was resolved, and that the proposal took effect under Rule 2034/12. This is consistent with the rules because quorum was previously set to 2. 7. Wait 7 days for self-ratification. This procedure would take less than 4 weeks and is reasonable for a single player to perform. Thus Agora is not ossified if there is a single player, and there is no lower number of players where Agora would not be ossified. TRUE. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
