Re: DIS: ranting about potential ruleset issue

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:51 AM ais523 via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 10:43 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > > fwiw, I plan to vote AGAINST any attempt to ratify the ruleset as the > > ruleset is currently as if we had been pla

Re: DIS: ranting about potential ruleset issue

On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 10:43 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > fwiw, I plan to vote AGAINST any attempt to ratify the ruleset as the > ruleset is currently as if we had been playing "correctly" this whole time. > > As it currently stands, a vote FOR would be a vote to maintain the stat

DIS: ranting about potential ruleset issue

fwiw, I plan to vote AGAINST any attempt to ratify the ruleset as the ruleset is currently as if we had been playing "correctly" this whole time. As it currently stands, a vote FOR would be a vote to maintain the status quo that got the ruleset into its current predicament. The status quo is very

DIS: Re: BUS: (@absurdor, @stonemason, @illuminator)

secretsnail9 via agora-business [2024-02-18 18:23]: > I wield the soul stone, specifying the radiance stone. > I wield the radiance stone. Wherefore has't thee hath called me? -- juan Absurdor