Oh, I'm just an all-round chaotic neutral. It doesn't really change the
game if it were to pass, so it'd be more interesting if it wasn't fixed.
On Sun, 14 July 2024, 1:11 pm Janet Cobb via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 7/13/24 22:09, Matt Smyth via
On 7/13/24 17:28, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> Proposal 9136 reads, in part:
>
>> Amend Rule 2691 ("Sortition Procedure") by, as a single amendment,
>> replacing the pargraph
>> {
>> At the beginning of each quarter, the ADoP CAN by announcement, and
>> SHALL in a timely manner, initiate
On 7/13/24 22:09, Matt Smyth via agora-business wrote:
> I object.
I think this fails, as it isn't clear which intent (or both) is being
objected to.
Also, can I ask why?
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 7/13/24 20:57, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> For the purposes of the geologist, has the rule been amended with no
> changes, or no amendment made at all?
I read this as the whole thing failing (so no amendment was performed).
However, neither has to be recorded in the history under
For the purposes of the geologist, has the rule been amended with no
changes, or no amendment made at all?
-- Forwarded message -
From: Janet Cobb via agora-official
Date: Sat, Jul 13, 2024, 2:28 PM
Subject: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Notes on Application of Proposals 9134-9141
To: Agora
On Sun, 2024-07-07 at 14:09 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
> snail wrote:
>
> > Do the awards, bozos
>
> Wins in 2023, based on comparing the Herald's reports of 2023-01-02 vs
> 2024-01-27 (the latter of which mentions that there were no new patent
> titles since Nov 2023):
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
