> It is actually possible that the Spivak uses in Agora's initial ruleset were
> taken
> from somewhere else. To quote Chuck from 1994 (see attached
> message):
>
> > A few comments: I deliberately left in problems and vague areas
> > because 1) I had a limited time (~1 week) to write this, and 2
Ah, thanks for this trip down memory lane!
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: agora-business [mailto:agora-business-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Kerim Aydin
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 9:29 PM
To: Agora Business
Subject: BUS: draft Thesis: an old currency system
[Hopefully not
It’s 23. And a belated happy birthday!
Chuck
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Jonatan Kilhamn
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:29 AM
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: and not to forget...
On 30 June 2016 at 03:
I got four short messages, including Quaize's, which were sent to the bak
list within the past twelve hours, but not the SLR.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Kerim Aydin
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 6:31 AM
To
Greetings and felicitations to all Agorans, past and present, and a happy
22nd birthday to Agora! Long may she live!
Chuck
Originator and Grand Hero, Agora Nomic
After less than two weeks of playing Nomic, when I was thinking this morning
that I needed to look up some details about a product, my internal monologue
told me that I needed to "check the Ruleset" for that.
Chuck
report
On 01/07/2013 2:54 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
> I also have an idea or two about how a group of players could get
> around the requirement of unanimity for making a rule mutable against
> a single player determined to prevent all such transmutations.
>
The majority can kick the min
3 12:35 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
> Like others have mentioned, I like the idea of a Nomic with a defined
> endpoint (being well aware, of course, that there is no guarantee that
> the endpoint will remain unchanged) in which I can most likely play
> for just a few weeks.
But there
> To my surprise and delight, Chuck almost immediately discovered the germ
> of
> an idea for a plausible Win By Paradox. I would have been very happy to
> see
> Chuck declared sole winner in this fashion. But Walker and Michael
> patiently and ingeniously picked apart his argument.
It
I transfer 10 points to Steve.
Chuck
Per rule 309, I cast an additional vote FOR proposal 364.
Chuck
Per rule 309, I cast an additional vote FOR proposal 364.
Chuck
Per rule 309, I cast an additional vote FOR proposal 364.
Chuck
Hi!
-Original Message-
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Ørjan Johansen
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 9:58 AM
To: Agora Discussion List
Subject: DIS: Boo!
Sometimes you just have to be there.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
I invoke judgement on the following statement: The assignment of Walker as
Judge for the statement "The selection of a Judge for this statement is a
move whose legality cannot be determined with finality" is a move whose
legality cannot be determined with finality.
Reasoning: same as before. This
I propose that Rule 302, or a Rule formerly having had the number 302 (if
there is exactly one such rule) be amended to read "Players whose proposals
are adopted shall receive 10 points."
Chuck
I propose that Rule 311, or a rule formerly having had the number 311 (if
there is exactly one such rule) be amended by changing the text defining the
time of the end of the game (such as, but not limited to, "On June 30th,
2013, at 00:04:30 GMT +1200, the game shall end") to "The game shall end
im
I propose that rule 311 be amended by changing the text which reads "the
Voter with the most points shall win. In case of a tie, all such Voters
shall win simultaneously." to "all Voters having a score greater than the
median score among Voters shall win."
Chuck
By the same logic by which one cannot propose to amend a currently immutable
rule, even if there is a pending proposal to transmute it, I do not believe one
can propose to amend a rule which does not yet exist.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-bou
ra Nomic discussions (DF)
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: Agora XX: Registration
HI Chuck! How are we all doing?
On 24 June 2013 21:29, Chuck Carroll wrote:
Hi Steve!
Chuck
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Gardner
Sent: Monday, June
Hi Steve!
Chuck
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Gardner
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 1:52 AM
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Subject: DIS: Agora XX: Registration
Happy 20th birthday, Agora. I register as a player of Agora XX
I propose that rule 311 be amended by deleting the text "There is no other
way to win."
Chuck
I propose the following rule be created:
If at any time four or more Voters have identical non-zero scores, the
Speaker wins the game.
Chuck
I invoke Judgement on the following statement:
The "proposals" numbered 312, 313, 318, 319, and 320 are not proposed rule
changes, and will have no effect if adopted, regardless of the adoption of
other currently existing proposals.
Reasoning: they propose to amend (currently) immutable rul
I propose that rule 110 be transmuted to mutable.
Chuck
A happy accident for me, as I would have been unavailable on the 29th, but
hope to make it on the 30th.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Aaron Goldfein
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 10:40 PM
To: Agora Nomic disc
I propose that Rule 110 be transmuted to mutable.
omd, I will vote for the transmutation of 112 if you will vote for the
transmutation of 110.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of omd
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 201
omd made two proposals in a message sent at 10:00 p.m. EDT on June 19.
Chuck
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Aaron Goldfein
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 12:58 AM
To: Fool; Agora Nomic discussions (DF)
Subject: Re: DIS: Agora XX: Proposal
I propose that Rule 211 be amended to read:
"Voters who voted against proposals which are adopted receive 2 points
apiece. Players whose proposals are adopted shall receive a random number of
points in the range 1-10 inclusive."
Chuck
I join Agora XX.
Chuck
Sad Hat
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Chuck Carroll
wrote:
> A very very belated happy 19th birthday to Agora. And shame on me for
> neglecting such an exalted day. I've now added it to my Google
> calendar, so I hopefully shan't forget in future years.
>
> Note: A
A very very belated happy 19th birthday to Agora. And shame on me for
neglecting such an exalted day. I've now added it to my Google calendar, so
I hopefully shan't forget in future years.
Note: Agora is older than Google by ~2.5 years (if you count from the
beginning of Sergey and Brin's project)
At 09:56 PM 6/29/2011, you wrote:
>On 06/29/11 18:23, Chuck Carroll wrote:
>>I send many warm wishes to Agora and to all current and former Agorans on the
>>occasion of Agora's 18th birthday.
>>
>>Looking over the ruleset, I find myself doubly astonished at its
loses the Patent Title of Hero and gains the Patent Title
>of Grand Hero of Agora Nomic.
>Chuck Carroll loses the Patent Title of Hero and gains the Patent
>Title of Grand Hero of Agora Nomic.
>Douglas Hofstadter loses the Patent Title of Hero and gains the Patent
>Title of Grand Hero of
Happy birthday, Agora! Wow, 13 years and still going!
Chuck Carroll
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.7/379 - Release Date: 6/29/2006
35 matches
Mail list logo
