I'm visually impaired thank you very much
On Dec 13, 2013 11:08 PM, "Ørjan Johansen" wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
>
> ok then this is me objecting to the whole darn prospect
>>
>
> Did you not read what I wrote, or are you just being a jerk?
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
even though my name is not on this list I also object we are still just
trying to get back up off the ground
2013/12/13 Nich Del Evans
> nichdel
>
>
> I object.
>
>
I assume promoter
On Dec 13, 2013 3:28 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
>
>
> I deputize for the IADoP to initiate the Agoran Decisions to select the
> holder of office of Government Waste. The vote collector is the
> IADoP; the eligible voters are the active first-class players.
>
> The candidates and p
I thought I was kicked off the list
On Dec 12, 2013 4:21 PM, "Joe Stefek" wrote:
> I got yours, and was wondering the same thing.
>
> --aperfectring
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Benjamin Schultz <
> ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I haven't received emails from several listservs
are there certain formats i need to use when doing this and don't just say
read the rules visual impairement and asperger syndrome mix very
interestingly
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
> > I sit (I think that
wait explain how the deuce they are faster than us at proposals a nomic is
a nomic is a nomic isn't it
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:26 PM, James Beirne wrote:
>
> On 2013-08-29 2:32 PM, "Benjamin Schultz"
> wrote:
> >
> > I think it would be properly Agoran to have our move adopted by
> proposal.
wait would we discuss aech move as a group before submission or is there
just one player who makes those decisions
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, James Beirne wrote:
> C-walker and I have been discussing the possibility of a nommit-Agora
> chess game as an initial attempt at internomic relatio
I smell anarchy
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I judge CFJ 3387 FALSE. I can't see a rule that would let you destroy a
> promise you don't own by announcement, given that there wasn't notice
> given at the appropriate time.
>
> --
> ais523
>
>
wait what the deuce what is with people who are already registered
re-registering
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Ian O'Dea wrote:
> > I register. I create the following persistent, revocable promise,
> entitled "Moar Zombies!": Text: I act as spec
woggle layman's terms please
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:49 PM, woggle wrote:
> On 8/14/13 10:48 , Charles Walker wrote:
> > I register. I create the following persistent, revocable promise and
> transfer it to Walker:
> >
> > Text: I act as specified by the casher in the cashing message.
> >
> >
OK seriously if you weren't going to cfj i was going to
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> > I register. I create the following persistent, revocable promise and
> transfer it to
wait what the deuce
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I register. I create the following persistent, revocable promise and
> transfer it to Walker:
>
> Text: I act as specified by the casher in the cashing message.
>
> -- Sam
ng with it, any more than there's something wrong
> > with playing two games of chess at once.
> >
> > Less, even, since outside of showing off it's considered polite to give
> the
> > one chess game you're in all your attention until it ends.
> &g
so we are allowed to be part of more than one nomic at once?
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> nommit has gone into a convention. Seems like a good time to join.
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/nommit/comments/1k8d78/new_game_convention/
>
i am just curious and i don't there was EVER an explanation given but i see
e in liue he almost like pirate language i am just wondering if those
dialects are like designated agoran language
wait we have to re-register again
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:14 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > I register.
>
> I also register, on the very remote chance that this actually does
> anything.
>
> --
> ais523
>
>
i realize craig this is the response to ambiguity but it seemed like a
straight forward move so to speak
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 6 August 2013 23:55, Craig Daniel wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> >> wai
wait why are you cfj'ing this
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 6 August 2013 22:58, omd wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
> >> I lean.
> >>
> >> (on comex)
> >
> > I get knocked down. But I get up again.
>
> CFJ: omd changed eir posture in
oh jeez comex you just had to make a reference to tub thumping
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:58 PM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
> > I lean.
> >
> > (on comex)
>
> I get knocked down. But I get up again.
>
it's good btw did you get my critiquing on your beginners guide
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I'd also appreciate any comments on this, which is obviously related
> to the "Players' Guide" post. H. Rulekeepor, Max Schutz, what do you
all i have to say on that is FINALLY
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> > On 6 August 2013 16:57, Craig Daniel wrote:
> >> The Tutor is an office whose holdor is responsible for maintaining the
> >> Tutorial. The T
ok we can attack this from either side and still arrive at the same
conclusion though you have to admit that timing of moves is a key element
of gaming
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> The thing is, though, Fool doesn't really have a plan. E created the
> promises and then
I was looking at it more like a stack than a circle but then again stack
is more of a magic the gathering thing though it does work in this case
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Alternative, far shorter argument for TRUE: Fool's alleged conditions were
> circular and there
i mean insane in terms of readability
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Max Schutz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Max Schutz
>> wrote:
>> > as long as that rule set becomes more acces
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > as long as that rule set becomes more accessible in its current state and
> > length it is borderline insane
>
> Agora has a long history of being borderl
as long as that rule set becomes more accessible in its current state and
length it is borderline insane
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:30 AM, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal
> >
> > title: Speak your mi
CURSE YOU GMAIL
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 00:04 -0400, Max Schutz wrote:
> > on 7564 Present
> > 7563 FOR
> > 7561 AGAINST
> > and if i am doing this wrong please let me know
>
> You sent your votes to agora-dis
on 7564 Present
7563 FOR
7561 AGAINST
and if i am doing this wrong please let me know
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 23:02 -0400, omd wrote:
> > NUM AI PF C AUTHOR TITLE
> I vote as follows:
> > 7548 10 O Ienpw IIIStandardized election
what if for promotion we did a nomic google hangout to raise awareness of it
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > (By the way, is the source code for the CotC site publicly available
alright through what rule/protocol did fool claim the game
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 4 August 2013 00:22, Fool wrote:
> > This danger doesn't even sound plausible to me. Everyone's confused and
> goes
> > home, and never comes ba
if this gets my name off that list of guilty then i support it too this is
insane
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 3 August 2013 02:32, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement using the mechanism
> > in
arkestra, ehird, FKA441344, FSX, G., Henri, Ienpw_III, Kolja,
> > Lindar, Machiavelli, Max Schutz, omd, OscarMeyr, Pavitra, Roujo,
> > scshunt, Sgeo, Tomas, Turiski, Walker, Wes, woggle, Wooble, and Yally.
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement using the mechanism
>
as far as advertising for me goes my best methods are on the radio since i
am an internet radio DJ. as far as getting and retaining players the
ruleset has atleast for me proven to be rather wordy and the concept is a
bit confusing the best way is to present a straight forward ruleset for
those wh
ok i must know less about nomic than i thought i didn't know there was a
correct and incorrect vote
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 1 Aug 2013 19:35, "Max Schutz" wrote:
> >
> > I need a little more intel on the red tape humbug and kirby
I need a little more intel on the red tape humbug and kirby proposal
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I vote:
>
> > 7548 10 O Ienpw IIIStandardized election days
> FOR (this is unambiguous enough for my taste)
>
> > 7549 2 25 O Walker Recruitment Sanity
> FO
on the grounds that i am understanding correctly I do favor this case
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
>
>> I submit a criminal case, barring the Serious Party, alleging that
>> Fool violated Rule 101 by failing to
sorry for being a pain but in lamens terms he tried to have us all
deregistered and kicked is that it sorry my learning disability makes it a
pain when there are a lot of words surrpounding a point
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I submit a criminal case, barring the Serious
please explain how fool is not a player
1. he is a living entity
2. he is capable of coherent english
3. he did register(I think)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:47 AM, John Smith wrote:
> If I register between now and when the intent expires, and the CfJ
> assignment is late, I can assign the case
since the census says i am inactive ibecome active again and do i just vote
here or is there a bizzare procedure to voting
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Walker wrote:
>
> > On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> scshunt wrote:
>>>
I hereby initiate the Agoran Dec
r the purpose of trying to scam something in Agora.
>
> -G.
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
>
> > wait now i am confused is agora xx its own nomic as is ambassador abuse
> or are they subdivisions of that thing we
> > know as agora
> >
wait now i am confused is agora xx its own nomic as is ambassador abuse or
are they subdivisions of that thing we know as agora
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Sgeo wrote:
> > A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 5 to read 'Ambabusese
someone please clarify this i thought it said you CAN taunt the police or
maybe i am just not understanding naughtiness as a whole
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:47 PM, John Smith wrote:
> I initiate a criminal CfJ accusing Bucky of committing the class-3 crime
> of Naughtiness (violating Rule 2356
uot; attitude during
> that period. It was most pleasant.
>
> Well, he also questionned me on why Agora had a distinct lack of hats,
> so take from that what you will. =P
>
> ~ Roujo
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
I am just curious what would set a nomic to "hostile
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> AMBASSADOR-AT-LARGE Recognition-of-Nomics Report
>
> Nomic | Recognition | Si
the paradox here seems to be if it already has a definition how can it not
be defined
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > isn't that statement paradoxica
isn't that statement paradoxical in nature
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I object, because AGAINT should never, by definition, be precisely defined.
>
alright i never understood this i see you have "eir" in lieu of their and i
have seen similar things like this in the rules is there some odd agoran
language i don't know about
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I intend to deputize for IADoP to publish eir report.
>
> -scshunt
there is probably something i missed in the rules but i did not know a rule
could become a golem
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I cause Rule 2380 to cause Rule 2361 to become a Slave Golem.
>
> I CFJ { Rule 2361 is a Slave Golem. }
>
> If Rule 2361 is a Slave Golem, I cause
well in the case of recycling i am not sure what a parent title is nor am i
sure of how a title in end of itself can be a handicap
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Max Schutz wrote:
> > i request clarification on ministry list
sean if you weren't going to say something i was lol
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:24 PM, omd wrote:
>
>> Proposal: Democratic Unilateralism
>>
>> Amend Rule 2380 (Richard Potato Boat) to read:
>>
>> The Dictator is an elected office. If the
i request clarification on ministry listen to the speaker and recycling
please
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I submit a proposal, titled "Recycling":
>
> Enact a rule, titled "Recycling":
>
> Any person CAN, by announcement, Recycle a Patent Title e Bears,
>
ewww
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > let me see if i understand this with this rule in effect the dictator can
> > pretty much do as he pleases to the rules
>
> That would be true, exc
let me see if i understand this with this rule in effect the dictator can
pretty much do as he pleases to the rules
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:24 PM, omd wrote:
> Proposal: Democratic Unilateralism
>
> Amend Rule 2380 (Richard Potato Boat) to read:
>
> The Dictator is an elected office. I
I only raised the question because every game i have discussed on my
podcast has phases and steps and things like that
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > Agora is my first nomic thus i am a little conf
Agora is my first nomic thus i am a little confused can new proposals arise
at any time or only after contests occur
thanks aaron and in response to the first part of that it doesn't do me
justice with this visual impairement of mine
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> > > I create the fol
can you clarify those acronyms for me
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> > I create the following promise, GVC:
> >
> > Text:
> > I spend 1 VC to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by one.
> > [eight times]
>
> If I cash
i support on the grounds that each rule be clarified as needed
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Basically, it would repeal all the rules and people would submit new
> rulesets and we would vote on which one to use.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Ma
I request clarification on this proposal in laman's terms if at all doable
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I become active and support.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> > It's been a good run, guys, b
on top of that you add in a visual impairment that really messes with my
head when things get wordy so again simple clarifications help a great deal
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > i attempted as i
remind of what those proposals are
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> The voting period on Proposals 7319–7321 has been extended to 14 days
> if and only if omd's votes of "FAP" were ineffective. In this case,
> somebody needs to vote on them or else they'll all fail.
>
> Tha
Yes
On Nov 30, 2012 10:10 AM, "Jonathan Rouillard"
wrote:
> Is anyone here?
>
> ~ Roujo
>
what if the cards were assigned a value of sorts to kind of raise the
stakes if you know what i mean
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Klaus Herrmanns
> wrote:
> > Maybe if we don't destroy all cards in case of a win, but e.g. just
> creat
B on the grounds that the basic act of trading implies card for a card
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Tanner Swett
> wrote:
> > > (d) Leave everything as it is,
> > > (e) Make the cont
I run icechat so i just needed the information for convenience sake
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > I know there is information on the website but can someone please
> provide me
> > with t
oh i did see one other person envoke the promise system
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > I submit 6 promises to the tree with the following tet
> >
> > I will offer a max trading card p
now what is cfj
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, omd wrote:
> > CFJ: I own multiple Machiavelli trading cards.
>
> I disfavor all open cases called by omd. -G.
>
>
>
>
I offer one Max Schutz card for one Machiavelli card
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:59 PM, omd wrote:
> > CFJ: I own multiple Machiavelli trading cards.
> > Arguments: None of the promises I attempted to cash were "copie
would it be a good idea to propose an addendum that the shorthand exists?
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Klaus Herrmanns wrote:
> > transfer one of the promises quoted below to myself (whatever that
> means)
>
> When someone "submits" a promise, it
I am willing to trade a max schutz card for an scshunt card do you accept
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > Oh, it's started already?
> >
> > I submit 12 promises to the Tree:
> >
> >
CFJ I own an ais523 card providing i did this all correct this time
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 00:08 -0500, Max Schutz wrote:
> > ok let's try this one more time I cash this promise by accepting a
> > copy of an ais523 in excha
alright providing i understand this correctly I cash the promise bearing in
mind that i do not have a copy of the ais523 card if this is incorrect
please let me know as i am a new player
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 23:48 -0500, Max Schutz wr
as a visually impaired individual i request clarification on "promises" and
"the tree"
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 23:03 -0500, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> >
ok that makes sense
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > ok now how do i use these cards if there was a message on how they are
> used
> > it was rather long and i am visually impaired
>
>
I will vote OMD
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:40 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, omd wrote:
> > This message initiates a bogus Agoran Decision to determine the new
> > Distributor. For this decision, the eligible voters are anyone who
> > cares, the voting period lasts five days,
ok now how do i use these cards if there was a message on how they are used
it was rather long and i am visually impaired
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > I am requesting citizenship inAgora as per
I second this motion
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Without three objections, I make the quoted document a contest.
>
> I intend to report every Wednesday.
>
> —Machiavelli
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > I intend, without three objections, to
77 matches
Mail list logo
