Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I am inclined to concur with Goethe's arguments as Appellant. Trial
Judge Goddess Eris's arguments do nothing to address the case, so on
first brush I want to reassign the case. I'm interested in what my
fellow Judges on the appeal panel have to say.
I have not seen any discussion from the rest of the appeal panel.
Accordingly, I submit my position officially:
With the agreement of my fellow appeal panelists in CFJ 1786a --
BobTHJ and Levi -- I intend to have the appeal panel rule REASSIGN, as
Goddess Eris's arguments in making her ruling did not address the case
at hand.
Sorry, this one had slipped past me :)
I agree to this judgement.
Levi
