DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal for amendment of 'Church and State'

2010-11-10 Thread scshunt
quot;. > > Replace every instance of the phrase "the pope" in the fourth > paragraph with the phrase "the previous pope". I transfer a prop from Sgeo, who I can't recall has ever submitted a productive proposal, to whoever that guy is because he has already grasped proper (i.e. pointless) nomic play. -scshunt

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6863-6869

2010-11-07 Thread scshunt
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 01:18:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> 6863 O 1 2.0 coppro Be Exact > AGAINST, announcing the amount should be SHALL >> 6864 O 1 3.0 coppro Urgency simplified > already failed quorum (the down side of urgent proposals is that they > can fail quorum faste

DIS: Re: BUS: Prop

2010-10-18 Thread scshunt
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:12:33 -0400, omd wrote: > Proposal: Refactor contracts (AI=2, II=1, Distributable via fee) > Coauthors: Murphy, ais523 > > Amend Rule 1742 (Contracts) by replacing this text: > > Parties to a contract SHALL act in accordance with that > contract. This obligat

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals

2010-10-14 Thread scshunt
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:47:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > coppro wrote: > >>The Promotor CAN distribute an Urgent Proposal as soon as >>possible, unless it ceases to be Urgent in the mean time. Failure >>to do so is the Class 1 Crime of Lack of Urgency. > > "The Promotor CA