Jonathan Fry wrote:
If finding officers is such an issue (and I'm probably not going to
consent to the above), would it be time to consider automating some of
these processes?
Historically, many officeholders have used some degree of automation.
I think a better way of putting what you're aiming
On 4/3/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan Fry wrote:
If finding officers is such an issue (and I'm probably not going to
consent to the above), would it be time to consider automating some of
these processes?
Historically, many officeholders have used some degree of automation.
I
Quazie wrote:
Unless the automated sites e-mailed a properly formated proposal to the
forum. Thus keeping both an updated archive and an automated system.
No, this still means there's no archive of what the submitter actually
submitted. There's only a record of what the automaton perceived.
The
Jonathan Fry wrote:
How do you know that a message sent by the mailing lists is actually what
was typed in by the user? Simple: the user objects if it is not.
It helps that mail transmission is a very standardised and reliable
service. I do not believe we have had even a single instance of a
Zefram wrote:
I suggest that if you want to manage the proposal pool largely
automatically then the automaton should accept submissions via email.
You just need to announce I prefer to receive proposal submissions in
this format: ..., and program the automaton to parse email messages
that
Maud wrote:
On 4/3/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to make Maud Herald by Agoran Consent.
You're doing this for the pun, aren't you?
What pun? Now if your nickname was Lloyd...
I think it's very possible that our low level of user friendliness is
what is keeping us from drawing in and keeping new players.
That agora is played over email is one of the reasons I like it. That
might just be me however. I like the simplicity that email presents
(rather than having to
7 matches
Mail list logo
