On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The question implicitly raised by these CFJs is whether equations
> constitute an exception to this general rule. If the rules can be
> reasonably interpreted so that the answer is yes, then TRUE is
> appropriate, applying Quaz
Zefram wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> For this CFJ I judge TRUE.
>>> This CFJ I find to be TRUE
>>> I find this CFJ to be TRUE.
>> I intend to appeal all of these (well, the TTttPF versions) with 2
>> support. Being a party to an eq
2 matches
Mail list logo
