Re: BUS: Re: DIS: PBA question

2008-10-20 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Oct 20, 2008, at 7:29 PM, Joshua Boehme wrote: Having just re-subscribed, I have no clue what is happening. Seeing as how that has yet to stop me, I register as a player. In the past, I have used the nickname Elysion, and since confusion seems to abound at the present I suppose I shall

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: PBA question

2008-10-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Joshua Boehme wrote: > Having just re-subscribed, I have no clue what is happening. Seeing as > how that has yet to stop me, I register as a player. In the past, I > have used the nickname Elysion, and since confusion seems to abound > at the present I suppose I shall conti

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: PBA question

2008-10-20 Thread Elliott Hird
On 20 Oct 2008, at 14:07, Geoffrey Spear wrote: I do agree that the existing coins in the PBA's possession should be destroyed, and that withdrawing assets should involve the destruction of coins rather than transfer to the PBA. Feel free to write a different draft, I'm amending it enough as-i

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: PBA question

2008-10-20 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the support of The People I intend to amend the PBA like so: I object. I'd prefer to leave the lost & found department out of it, and have coins created in the possession of the PBA when anyone destroys them without m