--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I'm reminded of (Peekee?) submitting a Protoposal (instead of
Proto-Proposal) and Kelly saying something like whatever the
hell that is; presumably should be handled by the Protomotor.
That's actually not a bad idea for an office.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 19:24, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal A Perpepuum mobile is possible (AI=2, II=2, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled Perpepuum mobile:
The Perpepuum
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
Enough ergs to discuss something?
Well, it was labelled distributable via fee.
... and the
Keba wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
Enough ergs to discuss something?
Well, it was labelled distributable via fee.
4 matches
Mail list logo
