> On Sep 12, 2017, at 10:06 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> I have a clause in there about imported Subers being traceable back to a
> Suber Creation Event. Presumably, this is something we’d do by proposal to
> authorize another nomic’s minting of new Subers. In other words, BN could
> fiat Sub
>how effective a coin is as a coin.
*In an economy where the value of a coin isn't tightly controlled and
easily transferred to become something else (like our shinies into wins and
CFJs and what have you, which serves as its "gold" value in the ye olde
economy banknote comparison)
On Tue, Sep 12
We could make a Rai stone economy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones
where we take something sufficiently worthy to be Rai-Stone-able, like Wins
for example ("ownership" of the win would just be a tag for purposes of the
coin, the win itself wouldn't be transferred, just its Rai Stone
incarn
On 09/12/17 09:06, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I have a clause in there about imported Subers being traceable back to a
> Suber Creation Event. Presumably, this is something we’d do by proposal to
> authorize another nomic’s minting of new Subers. In other words, BN could
> fiat Subers into existence
I have a clause in there about imported Subers being traceable back to a Suber
Creation Event. Presumably, this is something we’d do by proposal to authorize
another nomic’s minting of new Subers. In other words, BN could fiat Subers
into existence, but Agora wouldn’t accept them.
Gaelan
> On
I think a universal "currency" would need to be backed on something "real"
at the beginning (like gold in the ye olde times) to be taken seriously for
competitive commerce, because "secret deal" trades and favors just seem to
be a superior kind of "banknote" to me. It's secret and more reliable -
i
Go on, tell us what you _really_ think of the Euro.
-o
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 7:21 AM, Nicholas Evans wrote:
>
> Using tge same cyrrency for distinct markets with distinct financial controls
> is usually a bad idea in the real world where people are incentivized to
> maintain it. It'll be wors
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 5:05 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> Idea: a “universal” currency that can be used across Nomics. I’d propose the
> name as “Subers,” but I’m not super attached to that. I’d implement it such
> that each Suber always belongs to one nomic. A nomic may internally allocate
> t
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
Also, I've found this as a public paste on Pastebin a while ago which
suggests that there is another Nomic out there, although I haven't been
able to find it (or the coup never happened): https://pastebin.com/dEwyiMRq
I've never heard of it but I recogni
My question was a bit more broad but I get the redundancy.
As for Blognomic, there is a way to keep it for more than one dynasty - to
win Blognomic and keep the rule that mantains Subers in your Ascension
Address. Not a permanent solution though, but doable if you're really into
that.
Is there a
I asked that same question in the last paragraph of my message.
Gaelan
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 6:35 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> What other active nomics are there aside from Blognomic?
>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> Idea: a “universal” currency that can be used a
What other active nomics are there aside from Blognomic?
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Idea: a “universal” currency that can be used across Nomics. I’d propose
> the name as “Subers,” but I’m not super attached to that. I’d implement it
> such that each Suber always be
Using tge same cyrrency for distinct markets with distinct financial
controls is usually a bad idea in the real world where people are
incentivized to maintain it. It'll be worse in a virtual world.
I'd still support if Subers didn't supplant shinies but rather was
exchangeable.
On Sep 11, 2017 4
i feel like weve passed the golden age of internet nomics
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Idea: a “universal” currency that can be used across Nomics. I’d propose the
> name as “Subers,” but I’m not super attached to that. I’d implement it such
> that each Suber always b
Idea: a “universal” currency that can be used across Nomics. I’d propose the
name as “Subers,” but I’m not super attached to that. I’d implement it such
that each Suber always belongs to one nomic. A nomic may internally allocate
their Subers however they wish, but that isn’t visible to other no
15 matches
Mail list logo
