Precisely because its gameplay-related is what makes it interesting (to me,
personally).
It's like finding a lego block and finding that it somehow relates to the
beginning of the universe.
Also, there seems to be a "Critical Mass" of activity that the Ruleset/game
design can handle at any time.
On Mon, 29 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Given the recent problems regarding philosophical discussion:
>
> How would people feel about making a new mailing list for these discussions
> to take place and maybe the Herald could post weekly summaries to official?
> This would a
As long as the discussions of philosophy have implications on the game
state, this will never be a functional solution.
Also, if my deregistration statement didn't make it clear, the problem is
not philosophy on face.
On May 29, 2017 4:03 PM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" <
p.scribonius.schol
Given the recent problems regarding philosophical discussion:
How would people feel about making a new mailing list for these discussions to
take place and maybe the Herald could post weekly summaries to official? This
would allow people to avoid the discussion without being completely out of th
4 matches
Mail list logo
